1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy as compared with strip biopsy for the treatment of gastric mucosal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One clinical series comparing a variation of EMRC (known as endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy) with standard EMR for the treatment of early gastric mucosal cancer showed a significant increase in the mean longest diameter of the resected specimen with the EMRC compared with standard EMR biopsy, although there was no comparison of the histological depth of the resected specimen [17]. This series was a retrospective review involving several endoscopists without formal prospective evaluation of the resected specimens [18]. Again, no randomization process was employed and two separate patient groups were compared [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One clinical series comparing a variation of EMRC (known as endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy) with standard EMR for the treatment of early gastric mucosal cancer showed a significant increase in the mean longest diameter of the resected specimen with the EMRC compared with standard EMR biopsy, although there was no comparison of the histological depth of the resected specimen [17]. This series was a retrospective review involving several endoscopists without formal prospective evaluation of the resected specimens [18]. Again, no randomization process was employed and two separate patient groups were compared [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we gradually switched to EAM because the procedure is straightforward and enables the resection of larger specimens than does strip biopsy [4]. However, conventional procedures for EMR such as EAM have a risk of recurrence because of incomplete resection when piecemeal EMR is used to resect larger lesions [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was initially performed by strip biopsy [1], followed by the development of techniques such as EMR with a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC) [2] and endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (EAM) [3,4]. In the latter half of the 1990s, techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were developed and gained popularity [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lesion is then lifted by forceps and situated into a snare (via the second channel of a dualchannel endoscope), such that the lesion is resected at the base by applying electrocautery [20] . (3) The "cup and suction" or EMR-cap technique is the most frequently used method of EMR in the esophagus [25] . This technique was first described by Inohue et al in 1993 [26] .…”
Section: Techniques Of Emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the EMR-cap technique are that a standard single-channel endoscope can be used, and only one endoscopy assistant is required. In addition, it appears that there is a lower risk of bleeding compared to the stripoff method [21,25] . The disadvantage is that it may be difficult to ensure that the entire lesion has been aspirated into the cap, and occasionally, visualization of the lesion can be obscured by the cap itself.…”
Section: Techniques Of Emrmentioning
confidence: 99%