2022
DOI: 10.3390/nursrep12040079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Canalization of vascular accesses is one of the most used techniques in hospitalization units. When talking about peripherally inserted catheters, we can differentiate between peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC), midline catheters, and long peripheral catheters (LPC). Midline catheters are rarely used despite being recommended for intravenous therapies lasting more than six days. This research is a pilot study of a longitudinal clinical trial. It aims to compare the complications associated with intravenou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In retrospective studies, vascular access events including infiltration, occlusion, and displacement were significantly more common in MCs than in other methods [17][18][19]. However, this may be related to the overall higher incidence of complications with peripheral access than with central access, especially when used for long-term therapy [10]. On the other hand, the complication rate associated with SPCs is unacceptably high, especially in patients exposed to multiple insertions over 4 days, and is approximately 36-70% [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In retrospective studies, vascular access events including infiltration, occlusion, and displacement were significantly more common in MCs than in other methods [17][18][19]. However, this may be related to the overall higher incidence of complications with peripheral access than with central access, especially when used for long-term therapy [10]. On the other hand, the complication rate associated with SPCs is unacceptably high, especially in patients exposed to multiple insertions over 4 days, and is approximately 36-70% [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such solutions must be administered, PICCs should be considered due to the risk of extravasation of highly irritating drugs or the development of thrombosis [9]. Outpatients who receive a series of scheduled intravenous infusions can benefit from the advantages of MCs, primarily by avoiding the insertion of numerous SPCs and the associated pain, discomfort, and potential complications [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%