“…Although several studies examining cross-sectional and longitudinal effects in volumes of brain regions have shown significant group differences between AD or FTD and their respective healthy controls (DeLeon, George et al 1991;Cuenod, Denys et al 1993;Golomb, deLeon et al 1993;Killiany, Moss et al 1993;Lehericy, Baulac et al 1994;Laakso, Soininen et al 1995;Frisoni, Beltramello et al 1996;Convit, De Leon et al 1997;deToledo-Morrell, Sullivan et al 1997;Jack, Petersen et al 1997;Krasuski, Alexander et al 1998;Bobinski, de Leon et al 1999;Jack, Petersen et al 1999;Killiany, Gomez-Isla et al 2000;Laakso, Hallikainen et al 2000;Xu, Jack et al 2000;De Santi, de Leon et al 2001;Dickerson, Goncharova et al 2001;Du, Schuff et al 2001;Rosen, Prull et al 2003;Stoub, Bulgakova et al 2005), the ability to detect structural patterns that enable accurate prediction for specific individuals is ultimately what determines the clinical value of MRI and measurements obtained from it. Our results further confirmed that evaluation of an extensive and optimally determined set of brain regions, which collectively form a spatial pattern of brain atrophy, is necessary and sufficient to obtain high diagnostic accuracy.…”