2020
DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1736263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of prolactin measurement in inferior petrosal sinus sampling with desmopressin for Cushing’s syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a study that performed a ROC curve in patients stimulated with CRH found an optimal 2.10 baseline cut-off, slightly higher than the traditional one of 2, although the post-stimulation cut-off point was 2.15, lower than the one usually used (38). A study with desmopressin, in turn, found values in the ROC curve of 1.76 at baseline, lower than the traditional one, but ≥3.9 after stimulation, higher than the gradient of three usually used, increasing baseline sensitivity but keeping the sensitivity after stimulation unchanged (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a study that performed a ROC curve in patients stimulated with CRH found an optimal 2.10 baseline cut-off, slightly higher than the traditional one of 2, although the post-stimulation cut-off point was 2.15, lower than the one usually used (38). A study with desmopressin, in turn, found values in the ROC curve of 1.76 at baseline, lower than the traditional one, but ≥3.9 after stimulation, higher than the gradient of three usually used, increasing baseline sensitivity but keeping the sensitivity after stimulation unchanged (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In our study, we did not perform the concomitant dosage of prolactin in samples collected from the inferior petrosal sinuses, a procedure that potentially reduces false negatives, as advised by some authors based on studies with CRH (49-51) and a study with desmopressin (31). These findings, however, were not confirmed by all groups, both with CRH (52) and with desmopressin (32), and their applicability depends on further studies to define its role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Хотя в литературе чаще всего используется значение ≥0,8 [19], в работе H. Akbari и соавт. была показана высокая диагностическая точность градиента при использовании значения ≥0,33 (чувствительность 100 %, специфичность 80 %), однако выборка была представлена всего лишь 20 наблюдениями [20]. В работе других авторов диагностическое значение градиента было ≥1,3 Л И Т Е Р А Т У Р А / r e f e r e n c e s с чувствительностью и специфичностью, достигающими 100 и 91 % соответственно [16].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In 2005, other diagnostic tests for differentiating CD from ectopic ACTH producing tumor such as inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS), corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test, octreotide scan or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) scan were not available in our country. The first limited series of performing IPSS have been reported in Iran in 2020 [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%