2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of Semisupervised Machine-Learning-Based Phenogrouping to Improve Risk Assessment for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their patient similarity network identified five patient phenogroups, and substantial variations in clinical comorbidities and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. For 30-day cardiovascular mortality, the use of phenogroup data in conjunction with the STS score was found to improve the overall prediction of mortality, when compared against using the STS scores alone (AUC 0.96 vs. AUC 0.8, p = 0.02) [37]. Similarly, Gomes et al studied 83 features of 451 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR and found machine learning methods were superior to STS and STS/ACC TAVR scores in predicting all-cause intrahospital mortality [38].…”
Section: Predicting Mortality Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their patient similarity network identified five patient phenogroups, and substantial variations in clinical comorbidities and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. For 30-day cardiovascular mortality, the use of phenogroup data in conjunction with the STS score was found to improve the overall prediction of mortality, when compared against using the STS scores alone (AUC 0.96 vs. AUC 0.8, p = 0.02) [37]. Similarly, Gomes et al studied 83 features of 451 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR and found machine learning methods were superior to STS and STS/ACC TAVR scores in predicting all-cause intrahospital mortality [38].…”
Section: Predicting Mortality Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdul Ghaffar [37] 354 TAVR cases divided into 2 cohorts STS score In-hospital and 30-day CV and all-cause mortality TDA and a cloud-based supervised AutoML platform (OptiML)…”
Section: Predicting Mortality Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azzalini applied an ML algorithm in 2648 patients to assess which contrast agent contributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) after PCI; they did not find any type to be significantly linked to AKI [ 55 ]. Abdul Ghffar et al developed a semi-supervised ML model in 344 patients with TAVR to isolate phenotyping groups and assess their relationships with clinical outcomes [ 56 ]. The ML algorithm isolated five phenotype groups that had significant differences in comorbidities and clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Application Of ML In Interventional Cardiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al applied ML for evaluating mitral inflow and aortic outflow (57). Abdul Ghaffar et al evaluated the role of semisupervised learning for phenogrouping based risk assessment in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (58). Group 5 was associated with significant in-hospital cardiovascular mortality (OR 3.5, p = 0.001).…”
Section: Role Of Ai In Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%