2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of the 15-item geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) for classifying minor and major depressive disorders among community-dwelling elders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
72
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, research validating their effectiveness in minority groups in the United States such as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations is largely lacking. Although cognitive function can affect the GDS-15 score, it is still an appropriate tool for older adults with different levels of cognitive function ( Conradsson et al, 2013 ; Shin et al, 2019 ). It is important to note that the GDS-15 has a higher validity among older adults with less cognitive impairment ( Conradsson et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research validating their effectiveness in minority groups in the United States such as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations is largely lacking. Although cognitive function can affect the GDS-15 score, it is still an appropriate tool for older adults with different levels of cognitive function ( Conradsson et al, 2013 ; Shin et al, 2019 ). It is important to note that the GDS-15 has a higher validity among older adults with less cognitive impairment ( Conradsson et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the two groups sorted by GDS, the participants' clinical characteristics and psychological measures are listed in Table 1. Based on previous studies, GDS was divided into a normal group and a depressed group (cut‐off point: 4/5) 34–38 . There was no significant difference between these groups in terms of MMSE score ≥ 24 points ( P = 0.12), which is an index of cognitive function, but there was a significant difference in CDR score of ≤0.5 between the groups ( P = 0.02).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected all the cohort patients over 60 years of age for this study. Although the cut-off between geriatric PLOS ONE and non-geriatric depression remains unclear, ranging from 60 [1,7,25,26] to 65 years old [27,28], we chose the age of 60 in order to compare our findings with those of the majority of studies focusing on the impact of CM in depressive disorders [1,7,25,26]. Before participating in the full assessment, the patients were interviewed by a psychiatrist at the expert centre in order to:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%