2009
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819daa14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of the “Candida score” for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: A prospective multicenter study

Abstract: In this cohort of colonized patients staying >7 days, with a CS <3 and not receiving antifungal treatment, the rate of IC was <5%. Therefore, IC is highly improbable if a Candida-colonized non-neutropenic critically ill patient has a CS <3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
265
3
21

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
17
265
3
21
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous studies, the Candida score was significantly higher in patients with IC than in the remaining groups, but the usefulness of this prediction rule is limited in patients undergoing abdominal surgery because in these circumstances the score is consistently higher than the discriminating cutoff point of at least 3. The CART analysis showed a very high negative predictive value, which is in agreement with data obtained by Ostrosky-Zeichner et al [3] with their prediction rule as well as with the CS in our two previous studies [2,4]. However, the CART positive predictive value was 42.4 %, which is clearly higher than 9 % obtained by the prediction rule of Ostrosky-Zeichner et al [3] and 13.8 % with CS in our previous study [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with previous studies, the Candida score was significantly higher in patients with IC than in the remaining groups, but the usefulness of this prediction rule is limited in patients undergoing abdominal surgery because in these circumstances the score is consistently higher than the discriminating cutoff point of at least 3. The CART analysis showed a very high negative predictive value, which is in agreement with data obtained by Ostrosky-Zeichner et al [3] with their prediction rule as well as with the CS in our two previous studies [2,4]. However, the CART positive predictive value was 42.4 %, which is clearly higher than 9 % obtained by the prediction rule of Ostrosky-Zeichner et al [3] and 13.8 % with CS in our previous study [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The CART analysis showed a very high negative predictive value, which is in agreement with data obtained by Ostrosky-Zeichner et al [3] with their prediction rule as well as with the CS in our two previous studies [2,4]. However, the CART positive predictive value was 42.4 %, which is clearly higher than 9 % obtained by the prediction rule of Ostrosky-Zeichner et al [3] and 13.8 % with CS in our previous study [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations