2018
DOI: 10.5145/acm.2018.21.2.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of Two-Step Algorithm with Earlier Growth Detection in Anaerobic Bottle and Time to Positivity to Predict Candida glabrata Fungemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TTD of C. glabrata in the FN Plus bottle was shorter than that of the Old and New FA Plus bottles (Old FA Plus 52.47 hours and New FA Plus 19.92 hours versus FN Plus 16.4 hours; P < 0.001). The increased proliferation of C. glabrata in the anaerobic bottle was consistent with several previous studies [ 11 13 ]. The yeast cell count was significantly higher in the FN Plus bottle compared with the Old FA Plus ( P <0.001), but yeast cell count difference was not statistically significant with New FA Plus ( P = 0.1581).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The TTD of C. glabrata in the FN Plus bottle was shorter than that of the Old and New FA Plus bottles (Old FA Plus 52.47 hours and New FA Plus 19.92 hours versus FN Plus 16.4 hours; P < 0.001). The increased proliferation of C. glabrata in the anaerobic bottle was consistent with several previous studies [ 11 13 ]. The yeast cell count was significantly higher in the FN Plus bottle compared with the Old FA Plus ( P <0.001), but yeast cell count difference was not statistically significant with New FA Plus ( P = 0.1581).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The TTD values were compared among the 14 isolates performed in triplicate for each bottle type (Table 2). The mean TTD of C. glabrata was 51. previous studies [11][12][13]. The yeast cell count was significantly higher in the FN Plus bottle compared with the old and new aerobic bottles (P = 0.002).…”
Section: Simulated Study Datamentioning
confidence: 59%