2004
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200305995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of visible dyes for the staining of protein or DNA in electrophoresis

Abstract: Since 1993, we have studied visible organic dye stains for protein or DNA to improve methodologies and developed the counterion dye staining method. The method employs two oppositely charged dyes that form an ion-pair complex in the staining solution. The selective binding of free dye to protein or DNA in the staining solution improves detection sensitivity and speed. It is a rapid and sensitive procedure, involving fixing/staining or staining/quick destaining steps that are completed in 1-1.5 h. The lowest de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, these two anionic complexes successfully marked proteins separated by SDS-PAGE due to disulfonate groups (Fiorini et al, 2018). Although the presence of the disulfonate groups has been widely used to achieve the (dye-SO 3 − / + NH 3 -protein) interaction, as stated above, other strategies can also be used (Jin and Choi, 2004). Cationic dyes can also interact with proteins, presumably by electrostatic interactions with negatively charged residues (e.g., the presence of -COO − in aspartate and glutamate) (Jin and Choi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As expected, these two anionic complexes successfully marked proteins separated by SDS-PAGE due to disulfonate groups (Fiorini et al, 2018). Although the presence of the disulfonate groups has been widely used to achieve the (dye-SO 3 − / + NH 3 -protein) interaction, as stated above, other strategies can also be used (Jin and Choi, 2004). Cationic dyes can also interact with proteins, presumably by electrostatic interactions with negatively charged residues (e.g., the presence of -COO − in aspartate and glutamate) (Jin and Choi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Fluorescence sensors are highly desirable because of their high sensitivity to fluorescence spectroscopy and light‐up probes, whose emission intensity increases when associated with biomolecules, and are useful markers in genomics and proteomics since binding events to the host molecule can result in the appearance of an intense fluorescence emission of the probes . Light‐up probes are mainly used for quantification of biomacromolecules and as stains in gel electrophoresis such as 1‐anilino‐8‐naphthalene sulfonate (1,8‐ANS), Nile Red and the SYPRO dye family . Nevertheless, studies aimed at better understanding the origin of fluorescence properties of a given probe and in particular, their dependence on the environment, are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA staining using counterion-dye can resolve this problem. As mentioned earlier, there are several counterion-dyestaining methods which use visible dyes to visualize protein and DNA following electrophoresis [12][13][14][15]. IB/MO staining, which uses two oppositely charged dyes, a cationic dye and an anionic dye, can form hydrophobic ion pair complexes during staining.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%