2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-1031-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uselessness of microbiological samples in acute appendicitis with frank pus: to collect or not to collect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…E. coli and S. anginosus were the most commonly cultured microorganisms in complicated appendicitis, mirroring our previous study and in line with other published studies [12,14,30,33,34]. Rate of infection with amoxicillinclavulanate-resistant E. coli remained similar to the last cohort (15% vs 14%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…E. coli and S. anginosus were the most commonly cultured microorganisms in complicated appendicitis, mirroring our previous study and in line with other published studies [12,14,30,33,34]. Rate of infection with amoxicillinclavulanate-resistant E. coli remained similar to the last cohort (15% vs 14%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, an escalation of the antimicrobial therapy, tailored to the microbiological results, did not prevent abscess formation in both the adult and pediatric population. 18,19 This consideration was further supported by our findings. In the ECA group, the presence of the abdominal drain did not reduce the rate of failure of the first-line therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Two main philosophies can be identified in the antibiotic regimens used to cover organisms that form intraabdominal abscesses (IAA) after complicated appendicitis: (1) to cover the most common pathogens empirically and change antibiotics based on clinical deterioration, or according to cultures from the abscess if an IAA forms, and (2) to start empiric treatment and send cultures from the primary operation and change antibiotics to cover organisms found in the cultures. This intraoperative swabbing of the peritoneum to identify resistant organisms is controversial [25], and was reviewed by Davies et al [6]. It is not certain that the dominating organisms found initially are those that establish abscesses, and several smaller series indeed show a large discrepancy between intraoperative and IAA cultures [7–10], and some data suggests that guiding antibiotics by peritoneal swabs gets even worse results than empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%