2019
DOI: 10.1002/eat.23130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User‐centered design for technology‐enabled services for eating disorders

Abstract: Objective Technology‐enabled services frequently have limited reach and suboptimal engagement when implemented in real‐world settings. One reason for these implementation failures is that technology‐enabled services are not designed for the users and contexts in which they will be implemented. User‐centered design is an approach to designing technologies and services that is grounded in information from the stakeholders who will be using or impacted by them, and the contexts for implementation. The purpose of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the challenges of population-based interventions is that little is actually known about what users may want. A general strategy is to first consider the interests/resources of the users/stakeholders, followed by using user-centered design [ 30 ] approaches to build out interventions designed with ultimate implementation in mind [ 5 ]. In building out the interventions, modern designs would be used (eg, the multiphase optimization strategy and others [ 1 , 2 , 31 , 32 ] to engineer optimized interventions, before evaluation in randomized controlled trials).…”
Section: Outcome Optimization Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenges of population-based interventions is that little is actually known about what users may want. A general strategy is to first consider the interests/resources of the users/stakeholders, followed by using user-centered design [ 30 ] approaches to build out interventions designed with ultimate implementation in mind [ 5 ]. In building out the interventions, modern designs would be used (eg, the multiphase optimization strategy and others [ 1 , 2 , 31 , 32 ] to engineer optimized interventions, before evaluation in randomized controlled trials).…”
Section: Outcome Optimization Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters can be iterated upon individually or simultaneously, depending on the research goals and study designs chosen. A variety of study designs and methodologies could be used, including traditional studies, descriptive/qualitative research (e.g., determining personalization strategies using user‐centered design methods; Graham et al, ), and information science methodologies (to predict outcomes, e.g., from user search histories or text messages, before obtaining outcome data), examined in a variety of ways (e.g., A/B or adaptive designs). We reiterate the importance of rapidly creating and testing iterations that can be efficiently deployed, allowing for rapid generation of data and feedback to inform future solutions (Graham et al, ).…”
Section: Putting It All Togethermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, we believe that reach, uptake, engagement, and outcomes can be best studied from a population‐based framework that focuses on optimizing outcomes overall and for subpopulations. To achieve this goal, modern research methods and models can be leveraged, such as statistical, data‐driven scientific frameworks, experimental designs, and user‐centered design methods, to study ways to expand reach while enhancing our understanding of what works for whom and improving outcomes (e.g., Brown et al, ; Collins, ; Collins, Murphy, & Strecher, ; Graham et al, ; Mohr, Lyon, Lattie, Reddy, & Schueller, ). For example, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (Collins, ) provides a framework for optimizing an intervention based on an optimization criterion.…”
Section: Putting It All Togethermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User‐centered design provides a methodology for engaging with end‐users to understand their needs and preferences by making users the center of the design process. Through collaborative and iterative engagement with end‐users, user‐centered design helps to make technological systems easier to understand, navigate, and evaluate (Graham et al, ; Norman, ). Design approaches are gaining traction for health‐related interventions (e.g., Jacobs, Clawson, & Mynatt, ; Miller & Mynatt, ; Patwardhan et al, ; Tendedez, McNaney, Ferrario, & Whittle, ; Toscos, Faber, An, & Gandhi, ), making this methodology ripe for informing an intervention for obesity and binge eating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%