2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icdmw.2018.00130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-Device Authentication in Mobile Banking Using APHEN for Paratuck2 Tensor Decomposition

Abstract: The new financial European regulations such as PSD2 are changing the retail banking services. Noticeably, the monitoring of the personal expenses is now opened to other institutions than retail banks. Nonetheless, the retail banks are looking to leverage the user-device authentication on the mobile banking applications to enhance the personal financial advertisement. To address the profiling of the authentication, we rely on tensor decomposition, a higher dimensional analogue of matrix decomposition. We use Pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data sets used in machine learning [1] and data mining [2] are multi-dimensional and, therefore, tensors and their decompositions are highly appropriate [3]. Because of the size of modern data sets, Tensor Decompositions (TDs), such as the CP/PARAFAC [4,5] decomposition, later denoted CP, are now challenged by other TDs such as DEDICOM [6] and PARATUCK2 [7,8]. CP decomposes the original tensor as a sum of rank-one tensors, as illustrated in figure 1, whereas DEDICOM and PARATUCK2 decompose the original tensor as a product of matrices and diagonal tensors, as shown in figures 2 and 3, respectively.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data sets used in machine learning [1] and data mining [2] are multi-dimensional and, therefore, tensors and their decompositions are highly appropriate [3]. Because of the size of modern data sets, Tensor Decompositions (TDs), such as the CP/PARAFAC [4,5] decomposition, later denoted CP, are now challenged by other TDs such as DEDICOM [6] and PARATUCK2 [7,8]. CP decomposes the original tensor as a sum of rank-one tensors, as illustrated in figure 1, whereas DEDICOM and PARATUCK2 decompose the original tensor as a product of matrices and diagonal tensors, as shown in figures 2 and 3, respectively.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%