2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-06016-9_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-Driven Development of a Novel Molecular Tumor Board Support Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A video published by them demonstrates how different tools, including cBioPortal, can be combined in a single user interface [42]. Among other requirements, they discovered, like we did, that a function "to search for comparable local cases" [12] is demanded by clinical experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A video published by them demonstrates how different tools, including cBioPortal, can be combined in a single user interface [42]. Among other requirements, they discovered, like we did, that a function "to search for comparable local cases" [12] is demanded by clinical experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We came across two related works taking place in Germany. Halfmann et al report that they developed a tool that aims to support the preparation process of a molecular tumor board as well as the presentation of a patient case during a meeting [12]. A video published by them demonstrates how different tools, including cBioPortal, can be combined in a single user interface [42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there are other works regarding software solutions for MTBs, these developments are still in early stages. Halfmann et al 32 developed an MTB support tool also using a user-driven development process. Their tool focuses on the presentation part of an MTB and not on the preparation including the search for clinical trials for MTB patients and furthermore, the study did not include a usability evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, few related studies involve clinicians. For example, Halfmann et al (67) in their study used questionnaires and interviews as the methods to gather information about requirements, workflows, weaknesses, and potential functionalities from MTB organisers. They performed a task analysis and used the results to develop a layout.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%