User Engagement for Large Scale Pilots in the Internet of Things

Drajić, Dejan; Andersson, Karl; Zhang, K.; Stembert, Nathalie; Malmberg, K.; Brekine, A.; Vanobberghen, Wim; Habibipour, Abdolrasoul; Waeben, Jan

doi:10.1109/telsiks46999.2019.9002017

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Drajic et al. [ 2 ] User Engagement for Large Scale Pilots in the Internet of Things. 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS), 2019, 46–53, doi: 10.1109/TELSIKS46999.2019.9002017.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Making co-creation operational: A RECONECT seven-steps-pathway and practical guide for co-creating nature-based solutions

Dushkova,

Kuhlicke

2024

MethodsX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Making co-creation operational: A RECONECT seven-steps-pathway and practical guide for co-creating nature-based solutions

Dushkova,

Kuhlicke

2024

MethodsX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Creative Toolkits for TIPS

Collard

Briggs

2020

Computer Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a survey of toolkits employed in research workshop approaches within TIPS (Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security) domains. Our survey was developed within wider design research to develop prototypes that support people in evaluating whether to trust that an online actor's identity is not recently faked, and that a service they are registering personal information with is legitimate; and a subsequent project involving a tool that invites people to reflect on the cumulative risks of sharing apparently harmless personal information online. The radically multidisciplinary nature of both these TIPS projects has determined that we create a research space to promote exchange to, as design researchers, better understand the 'opaque' immediate and longer term implications of our proposed services and invite cross-disciplinary discussion towards interdisciplinary understandings. This paper is intended as an at-a-glance resource, or indeed toolkit, for researchers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds working on TIPS research to inform on various different material engagements, with research stakeholders, through creative workshop approaches. Our survey focused on the literature from Design (especially Participatory Design and Codesign), Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and cybersecurity. It comprises 27 papers or toolkit examples organised across: review papers; example toolkits; case studies reporting relevant toolkit use; applied toolkits for learning/knowledge exchange; research toolkits focused on demonstrating a methodological-conceptual approach (some problematising emergent or near-future technologies); and two papers that straddled the latter two categories, focusing on future practical application. We begin with an overview of our rationale and method before presenting each group of texts in a table alongside a summary discussion. We go on to discuss the various material components, affordances and terminology of the toolkits along with core concerns often left out of the reporting of research; before going on to recognise toolkits not so much as things that diagnose and fix things, but as a loose collection of readily available material and wider resources, used in particular participatory approaches, which together help account for techno-relational differences and contingencies in TIPS-related fields.

show abstract