2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
113
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
113
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Related studies broadly confirmed the relevance of the TTF construct to assess the value of an IS (Goodhue 1995) and to assess and predict system usage (Dishaw and Strong 1998) and individual performance (Goodhue et al 2000). Staples and Seddon (2004) confirmed that the technology-toperformance model can explain performance for both mandatory and voluntary use settings.…”
Section: Task-technology Fit To Explain Is Successmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Related studies broadly confirmed the relevance of the TTF construct to assess the value of an IS (Goodhue 1995) and to assess and predict system usage (Dishaw and Strong 1998) and individual performance (Goodhue et al 2000). Staples and Seddon (2004) confirmed that the technology-toperformance model can explain performance for both mandatory and voluntary use settings.…”
Section: Task-technology Fit To Explain Is Successmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Staples and Seddon (2004) confirmed that the technology-toperformance model can explain performance for both mandatory and voluntary use settings. Different aspects of TTF have been confirmed relevant for IS in general (Ferratt and Vlahos 1998, Goodhue 1995, Goodhue 1998, Goodhue et al 1997, and Goodhue and Thompson 1995, as well as for specific technologies Strong 1998, 1999;Goodhue et al 2000), and for a variety of tasks Strong 1998, 1999;Ferrat and Vlahos 1998;Goodhue 1995Goodhue , 1998Goodhue and Thompson 1995;Goodhue et al 1997Goodhue et al , 2000Majchrzak, Malhotra and John 2005;Staples and Seddon 2004).…”
Section: Task-technology Fit To Explain Is Successmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, we argue that current IS models individually are not broad enough to measure such a relationship as they do only capture a subset of the factors in the broad context of IS, reflecting a common agreement between many researchers [29], [16], [21]. For example, TAM and TTF overlap in a significant way and they could provide a more coherent model if they are integrated, such that model could be even stronger than either standing alone.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Despite the large body of existing research on TAM, TTF and D & M's models [21], [28], [20], none of these models have achieved universal acceptance either due to narrowness of focus or inadequately developed methodologies [10]. These largely independent streams of research sparked our interest to explicitly discuss the main weakness in previous models with the goal of combining a new powerful validated model to further the understanding of the relationship between IS and users including performance impacts and systems usefulness [22], [13], [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted on adoption of health information technology stressed on a large number of adoption complications that emanated from lack of fit between technological, human and organizational contexts [5], [96][97][98][99]. Recently, Yusof et al [100] and Yusof et al [101] identified the important dimensions through conducting a rigorous evaluation of health information system adoption.…”
Section: Human-organization-technology Fit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%