User Expectations and Experiences in Using Location-Based Game in Educational Context

Vuorio, Jaakko; Okkonen, Jussi; Viteli, Jarmo

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7361-9_2

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Generally, we found two types of evaluations in works involving hybrid games: preand post-test interviews and questionnaires. The questionnaires include authors' instruments and well-known questionnaires such as SUXES used in [Vuorio et al 2019] and the Emoti-SAM, which was adopted in the work of [Carbajal and Baranauskas 2019]. These two instruments are used to evaluate the user experience.…”

Section: Rq6: What Was the Target Audience?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the cases of [Berns et al 2016] (12 participants), [Carbajal and Baranauskas 2019] (19 participants), [Kasapakis et al 2015] (30 participants) and [Kopeć et al 2017] (30 participants) the approval was 100%. The work with the most participants was that of [Vuorio et al 2019] with 328 respondents and acceptance of 79%. There was also work that chose to make their acceptance assessment through questionnaires on a Likert scale, as in [Wu et al 2018] (151 participants), [Covaci et al 2018] (117 participants) and [Shih et al 2017](20 participants) who had their approval with an average of 3.25, 3.89 and 3.93 respectively.…”

Section: Rq6: What Was the Target Audience?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Mapping of Hybrid Games in the Academy

Paiva

Mendonça

Viana

2022

Anais Estendidos Do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro De Jogos E Entretenimento Digital (SBGames Estendido 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hybrid games can be defined as games that combine digital and analog elements in their composition. However, hybrid games bring with them challenges from both the digital and analog domains, making their development and evaluation complex. The main objective of this paper is to rise state of the art and the practice of hybrid games in academia. A standard systematic mapping methodology using digital databases for research was applied and 31 works out of a total of 395 were accepted. Through their analysis it was possible to identify the main technologies used, the areas of greatest predominance in the use of hybrid games and the methods of most used assessment.

show abstract

Section: Rq6: What Was the Target Audience?mentioning

confidence: 99%