Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3543174.3546847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User Experience of In-Vehicle Gesture Interaction: Exploring the Effect of Autonomy and Competence in a Mock-Up Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research pointed toward the positive influence BPN Satisfaction has on technology use. For example, studies revealed that BPN Satisfaction led to higher acceptance of a chatbot (De Vreede et al, 2021), more positive customer experience with a service chatbot (Jiménez- Barreto et al, 2021), and higher acceptance of invehicle gesture interaction with an automotive user interface (Stiegemeier et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research pointed toward the positive influence BPN Satisfaction has on technology use. For example, studies revealed that BPN Satisfaction led to higher acceptance of a chatbot (De Vreede et al, 2021), more positive customer experience with a service chatbot (Jiménez- Barreto et al, 2021), and higher acceptance of invehicle gesture interaction with an automotive user interface (Stiegemeier et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no specific BPN scale tailored to technology use. Previous studies assessing BPN Satisfaction in broader user experience design contexts (e.g., Hassenzahl et al, 2010; Karapanos et al, 2015; Lallemand et al, 2014; Partala & Kallinen, 2012; Tuch et al, 2013), automotive user interface design (Stiegemeier et al, 2022), or during chatbot interaction (e.g., De Vreede et al, 2021; Jiménez-Barreto et al, 2021; Moradbakhti et al, 2022) have used individually adapted versions of the existing scales to measure BPN Satisfaction. Even though the studies have confirmed the significance and influence of BPN Satisfaction for HCI research, the inconsistent use of measures is problematic in terms of comparability between studies and their replicability.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research pointed towards the positive influence BPN Satisfaction has on technology use. For example, studies revealed that BPN Satisfaction led to higher acceptance of a chatbot [De Vreede et al, 2021], more positive customer experience with a service chatbot [Jiménez-Barreto et al, 2021] and higher acceptance of in-vehicle gesture interaction with an automotive user interface [Stiegemeier et al, 2022].…”
Section: Need Satisfaction and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no specific BPN scale tailored to technology use. Previous studies assessing BPN Satisfaction in broader user experience design contexts [e.g., Hassenzahl et al, 2010, Karapanos et al, 2015, Lallemand et al, 2014, Partala and Kallinen, 2012, Tuch et al, 2013, automotive user interface design [Stiegemeier et al, 2022], or during chatbot interaction [e.g., De Vreede et al, 2021, Jiménez-Barreto et al, 2021, Moradbakhti et al, 2022 have used individually adapted versions of the existing scales to measure BPN Satisfaction. Even though the studies have confirmed the significance and influence of BPN Satisfaction for HCI research, the inconsistent use of measures is problematic in terms of comparability between studies and their replicability.…”
Section: Measurement Of Basic Psychological Need Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%