2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User Generated vs. Supported Contents: Which One Can Better Predict Basic Human Values?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no individual correlation between a LIWC measure and a PVQ measure was higher than r = .18, 13.8% to 18.2% of the variance in PVQ scores could be explained via the LIWC measures in total. Mukta et al (2016) used LIWC measures as well to predict the PVQ scores of 567 Facebook users from their status updates; they were able to explain between 13.3% and 21.1% of the variance in the PVQ measures. Gou et al (2014) used a linguistic model that was trained on texts created by Amazon MTurk workers to predict value orientations from tweets.…”
Section: Previous Attempts To Estimate Individuals' Value Orientations From Textual Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although no individual correlation between a LIWC measure and a PVQ measure was higher than r = .18, 13.8% to 18.2% of the variance in PVQ scores could be explained via the LIWC measures in total. Mukta et al (2016) used LIWC measures as well to predict the PVQ scores of 567 Facebook users from their status updates; they were able to explain between 13.3% and 21.1% of the variance in the PVQ measures. Gou et al (2014) used a linguistic model that was trained on texts created by Amazon MTurk workers to predict value orientations from tweets.…”
Section: Previous Attempts To Estimate Individuals' Value Orientations From Textual Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual coding methodologies are ill-suited to use for large bodies of text (Portman, 2014), while most others to date are extremely brief and thus unable to capture most references to values (Bardi et al, 2008). Much research to date is not specifically designed to align with a theory (LIWC-based approaches; Chen et al, 2014;Christen et al, 2016;Mukta et al, 2016) or, in more extreme cases, use machine-learning approaches where results strongly depend on the specific texts used for training the algorithm (Gou et al, 2014;Sun et al, 2014) and therefore have limited generalizability. Finally, some are impossible to validate independently (IBM Watson, 2018).…”
Section: Previous Attempts To Estimate Individuals' Value Orientations From Textual Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They identified values with a data‐driven approach. Mukta et al () identified values from both user‐generated (that is, statuses) and supported contents (that is, page‐likes) in Facebook. Hsieh et al() found a relation between user's reading interest and values in Twitter.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these social networking mediums are interlinked. A number of studies have been conducted on values [17], personality [18], and preferences [19]. In this paper, we analyze the sentiments derived from the post/tweets that found in social networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%