2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-Interface Design for Individualization Services to Enhance Sustainable Consumption and Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brunø et al [16] call for an assessment of the whole life cycle within MC and thus promote the LCA perspective as well without explicitly stating the need for the quantification of the impacts. Yet it remains difficult to integrate sustainability aspects into MC/MP, as shown by Hankammer et al [17] with only a minor share of configurators including these aspects at all. This is also reflected in the meta-study conducted by Gembarski et al [18] finding that especially environmental aspects are vastly underrepresented in MC business models.…”
Section: Sustainable Mass Customisation and Mass Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brunø et al [16] call for an assessment of the whole life cycle within MC and thus promote the LCA perspective as well without explicitly stating the need for the quantification of the impacts. Yet it remains difficult to integrate sustainability aspects into MC/MP, as shown by Hankammer et al [17] with only a minor share of configurators including these aspects at all. This is also reflected in the meta-study conducted by Gembarski et al [18] finding that especially environmental aspects are vastly underrepresented in MC business models.…”
Section: Sustainable Mass Customisation and Mass Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of software for process simulation could predict the changes in the quality of food products subjected to operations. Nevertheless, the availability of systems with this feature is still limited in food industry, 2001x Coulston et al (2003) x German et al (2004) x x Grunert (2005) x x x Fisher et al (2005) x x x x x Nowak- Wegrzyn (2007) x Sun (2007) x x x x x Boland (2008) x x x x Kumar (2008) x Awazu et al (2009) x x Dorman et al (2009) x x Rahimnia, Moghadasian and Castka (2009) x x Gehlhar et al (2009) x x Mahalik and Nambiar (2010) x 2014x Sorouri et al (2014) x Poínhos et al (2014) x Chen et al (2014) x x Haugaard, Brockhoff and Lähteenmäki (2016) x Keenan et al (2015) x x Lipton et al (2015) x x Nagpal, Lei and Khare (2015) x x x x Sun et al (2015) x x Ferreira and Alcântara (2015) x x x x Adeigbe et al (2015) x x Ferreira and Alcântara (2016) x x x x Balcombe et al (2016) x x Donadini et al (2016) x x x Hankammer et al (2016) x Wolf and Zhang (2016) x very reason that software developers have added strength to invest resources in the development of specific food processing capabilities (HALDER et al, 2011). A feature of the software, in general, is that components in a virtual environment can be multiplied easily and at low cost (VERDOW; BEULENS; WOLFERT, 2014), which enables customization.…”
Section: Foods Processing and Its Enablersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food consumers have demanded specific products adjusted to their individual needs and preferences (NYSTÉN-HAARALA; LEE; LEHTO, 2010). For the acceptance of food customization, consumers can be influenced by hedonic and utilitarian attributes (NAGPAL; Product: Management & Development LEI; KHARE, 2015); health and taste (BHARADWAJ;NAYLOR;TER HOFSTEDE, 2009;TRIENEKENS et al, 2012); ecological factors (GEHLHAR et al, 2009;HANKAMMER et al, 2016); promotion feelings (WANG; KANDAMPULLY, J.; JIA, 2013); customization level offered (WOLF; ZHANG, 2016); cultural characteristics (PULLMAN;VERMA;GOODALE, 2001;ADEIGBE et al, 2015;DONADINI et al, 2016); and also factors such as waiting time and price of product (PULLMAN; VERMA; GOODALE, 2001).…”
Section: Identification Value Perceived By Customers To Customized Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Os consumidores de alimentos têm exigido produtos específicos, adaptados às suas necessidades e preferências individuais. Para a aceitação da customização de alimentos, os consumidores podem ser influenciados por atributos hedônicos e utilitários (NAGPAL et al, 2015); saúde e sabor que os alimentos apresentam (BHARADWAJ et al, 2009;TRIENEKENS et al, 2012); fatores ecológicos (GEHLHAR et al, 2009;HANKAMMER et al, 2016); sentimentos de promoção (WANG et al, 2013); nível de customização oferecida (WOLF; ZHANG, 2016); características culturais (PULLMAN et al, 2001;ADEIGBE et al, 2015;DONADINI et al, 2016); e também fatores como o tempo de espera e o preço do produto (PULLMAN et al, 2001). …”
Section: Barreiras Para Adoção De CM Em Empresas Alimentíciasunclassified