2014
DOI: 10.3233/sw-2012-0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User preferences in the web of data

Abstract: This article introduces a domain-and application-independent language for representing preferences as part of user profiles. It also describes the translation of statements of this language to RDF datasets using a new ontology named Framework for Ratings and Preferences (FRAP). The availability of this language and its RDF representation enable the effective exchange of user preferences across different applications in the web environment. The practical usage and limitations of this approach are also discussed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will also help us further develop the language, identifying additional 'syntactic sugar' constructs that can hint at optimizations targeting intransitive relations that fall outside the scope of BNL. Further extensions could allow the client to refer to preferences and preference-related metadata within the knowledge base itself [14,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will also help us further develop the language, identifying additional 'syntactic sugar' constructs that can hint at optimizations targeting intransitive relations that fall outside the scope of BNL. Further extensions could allow the client to refer to preferences and preference-related metadata within the knowledge base itself [14,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, binary preferences have been studied in recommender systems under a twofold perspective: quantitative [33][34][35], relying upon a scoring function to determine a total order of results; qualitative [13,36,37], using binary relations to express a (strict) partial order of results. In the scope of this paper, we focused on qualitative preferences, yielding a higher expressiveness with respect to quantitative ones.…”
Section: Preference-based Recommender Systems For Data Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13] a preferencebased framework is implemented in a Data Warehouse, where preferences are formulated over aggregation levels of facts. In [33], preferences are formalised as constraints on semantic resources, mixing both quantitative and qualitative aspects, whereas [36] devises an extension of SPARQL query language for expressing preferences on semantic data. Beyond the qualitative and quantitative aspects, contextual preferences have been studied, to take into account different situations users are involved in.…”
Section: Preference-based Recommender Systems For Data Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation