2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User preferences related to virtual reference services in an academic library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graduate students are more likely than faculty members to be of the generation whose first preference for research help is online, but they have more in-depth and detailed research needs than undergraduates. The "personalness" of chat, as discussed by Mawhinney (2020), may play a role here, as graduate students may feel that they have a relationship with their home library. They may be put off by the idea that they are not in fact interacting with someone from their library who is familiar with their needs or who can provide tailored research assistance.…”
Section: Research Question #1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graduate students are more likely than faculty members to be of the generation whose first preference for research help is online, but they have more in-depth and detailed research needs than undergraduates. The "personalness" of chat, as discussed by Mawhinney (2020), may play a role here, as graduate students may feel that they have a relationship with their home library. They may be put off by the idea that they are not in fact interacting with someone from their library who is familiar with their needs or who can provide tailored research assistance.…”
Section: Research Question #1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students preferred chat services because they perceived virtual reference services via email to be too slow. However, when using email, students indicated a preference for contacting a personal email account, like that of a liaison librarian, over a generic email address (Mawhinney, 2020). Faculty also preferred contact with liaison librarians assigned to their subject area (Shoham & Klain-Gabbay, 2019, as cited in Mahwinney, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conversational language in the digital arena can be crucial to making the interaction feel more relational as opposed to transactional (Pyburn, 2019; Dempsey, 2016). The “personalness” of chat interactions (such as engaged conversation) rated highly for users in a study at McGill University Libraries, too, especially for distance education students (Mawhinney, 2020). Utah State University Libraries discovered that, with chat, when body language and other contextual cues are missing, it becomes critical to promote approachability and friendliness via choice of words (Eastman et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%