User requirements for the design of smart homes: dimensions and goals

Abstract

The ‘Smart Home’ is a strongly technology-driven field. While user-centered requirements have been reported for specific features, a considerable gap persists for design based on an everyday home context and the social and emotional nature of the home. To address this, we present a user-centered design process to question and expand narrow framings of energy-efficiency and smart control and consider the richness and variety of the domestic context as design space for smart homes. Our three-step investigation employs cultural probing, participatory design fiction, and focus groups to progress from the home context “as-is” towards a blending of values with technological responses. Our findings highlight the home as a complex construct imbued with organically grown practices and individual and collective needs, values, and emotions. Based on empirical, real-user data we present features and system expectations that address this multifaceted overall picture. This paper advises the design process of future smart home solutions in three facets: first, we discuss the value of the design process applied in this study and future possibilities to expand. Second, we show design dimensions, namely time, space, relations, individual factors, and values that allow design for a heterogeneity of users and situations. Third, we derive specific design goals to highlight directions of smart home system design: design for control, low effort, integration, evolvability, identity, sociability, and benefits.

Who are Smart Home Users and What do they Want? – Insights from an International Survey

“…Reisinger et al [7] proposed that adequate design goals are an important factor in creating a user-centred product. Reisinger realised that smart home users appreciate functionalities such as comfort, sustainability, security, lower heating and energy costs, and fun.…”

Design and Development of IoT based Smart System for Monitoring Laboratory Environment

“…The resources and liabilities of smart systems are dependent on the specific context, goals, and requirements of the intended application of the smart structure (Reisinger et al, 2022). The major liabilities of smart structures are high initial costs of the smart equipment, and non-compatibility of the system with most obsolete apparatus and machines, though retrofitting package have been developed to boost the compatibility of older tools and machines with modern advance smart technologies (Pandiyan et al, 2023).…”

Ontoagency: An Agency-Based Ontology for Tracing Control, Ownership and Decision-Making in Smart Buildings

“…While the complexities of designing and operating buildings increase as result of these changes [18,[23][24][25], the authors argue that the new interactions and changes in relationships between social and technical systems in buildings are still poorly understood by decision-makers. Professionals involved in the design and operation of buildings 'reflect in action' [26]; they reflect on their decisions while deciding upon them but tend not to trace the consequences of their actions to the different stakeholders involved in a project, particularly end-users.…”