User-Technological Index of Precision Agriculture: Data Collection and Visualization

Masner, Jan; Jarolímek, Jan; Stočes, Michal; Šimek, Pavel; Vaněk, Jiřı́; Ocenásek, Vladimír

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02312-6_10

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This exploration is particularly relevant when considering tools like the User-Technological Index of Precision Agriculture (UTIPA). The index is based on evaluating technological advancement and applicability for agricultural practice (Masner et al, 2019). That could benefit from improved VR UX to support precision agriculture communities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a Functional User Interface for VR Simulations within Agricultural Equipment Contexts

Brabec,

Benda,

Benda

et al. 2024

AOL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the optimization of VR simulation interfaces for agricultural machinery, emphasizing the critical role of skill development and targeted education in enhancing agricultural efficiency. By utilizing eye-tracking technology, the research evaluates user experience (UX) across two menu designs - panel and radial -in VR settings. Results highlight the significance of intuitive menu design in facilitating user navigation and information access, with the panel menu outperforming the radial menu in usability. Despite some preferences for the radial menu's features, the panel menu is favored for its user-friendly design and ease of access, particularly in agricultural simulations. The findings suggest that effective VR interface design, supported by focused training, can significantly improve operational efficiency in agriculture.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%