2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2008.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User trial of Easypod™, an electronic autoinjector for growth hormone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support the findings of previous, smaller (up to 61 patients), shorter-term (up to 60 days) studies, which together indicate a high level of patient acceptance of the electronic auto-injector for daily administration of r-hGH [14,15]. Results from an open-label multicentre survey that included 61 patients showed that the majority of patients had a good overall impression of the device after 60 days of use [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results support the findings of previous, smaller (up to 61 patients), shorter-term (up to 60 days) studies, which together indicate a high level of patient acceptance of the electronic auto-injector for daily administration of r-hGH [14,15]. Results from an open-label multicentre survey that included 61 patients showed that the majority of patients had a good overall impression of the device after 60 days of use [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, the nurses/physicians who trained them how to use the device also rated the device favourably with respect to participants' ease in learning to use the device [14]. Unlike previous user trials of the electronic auto-injector [14,15], the current study is the first to include data on adherence as captured using the device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, delivery systems with needle-free designs were preferred by patients. At least five studies reported a degree of automation in the device as one of the key factors affecting choice of delivery systems (Ahmed et al, 2008;Dahlgren et al, 2007;Fuchs et al, 2009;Shine et al, 2003;Tauber et al, 2008), and only one study (Wickramasuriya et al, 2006) did not find that automation influenced patient preference. Wickramasuriya et al (2006)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this higher preference were ease of use, less time‐consuming procedures by avoiding any reconstitution, less painful injection, and acceptable drug tolerability. Additionally, one open‐label, multicenter study that evaluated patients' acceptability of Easypod ® (EMD Serono, Rockland, MA, USA) among patients diagnosed with GHD, Turner syndrome, CRI, or SGA (Dahlgren et al., 2007; Tauber et al., 2008), showed that factors such as display of the remaining drug in the cartridge, preprogrammed dosing, on‐screen instructions, and automatic needle attachment were viewed “very useful” by all patients studied (Dahlgren et al., 2007; Tauber et al., 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%