2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User values and the development of a cybersecurity public policy for the IoT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarize, as smart devices are growing in number, there is a corresponding growth in risks, both to the user and to the Internet as a whole from hacking threats [54]. However, there is a lack of policy direction, user values on cybersecurity are misunderstood, and there is a lack of clarity as to how IoT public policy should be developed in terms of, for instance, being guided by stakeholder values [10]. Moreover, a new paradigm of proactive antifragility for cyber defense approaches is demanded in the IoT, namely in distributed highly complex computing paradigms beyond traditional cyber defense (e.g., the Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) [9]), in order to cope with novel threats [53].…”
Section: The Internet Of Things (Iot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To summarize, as smart devices are growing in number, there is a corresponding growth in risks, both to the user and to the Internet as a whole from hacking threats [54]. However, there is a lack of policy direction, user values on cybersecurity are misunderstood, and there is a lack of clarity as to how IoT public policy should be developed in terms of, for instance, being guided by stakeholder values [10]. Moreover, a new paradigm of proactive antifragility for cyber defense approaches is demanded in the IoT, namely in distributed highly complex computing paradigms beyond traditional cyber defense (e.g., the Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) [9]), in order to cope with novel threats [53].…”
Section: The Internet Of Things (Iot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IoT has therefore become prevalent over diverse sectors, with the Internet of Battlefield Things (IoBT) or the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) [3,9], along with its security issues, contributing to an increasing number of cyber-attacks. Consequently, there has been recent concern with cybersecurity in this domain, amid a lack of policy direction and a lack of understanding of user values related to cybersecurity in terms of the IoT, while policy has not been guided by key stakeholder values [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2016; Dhillon and Torkzadeh, 2006; Coss et al. , 2019; Dhillon and Smith, 2019; Smith et al ., 2021a, b; Keeney et al. , 1990; Keeney, 1996).…”
Section: Literature Review Of Cyberstalking Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, as the Smart Devices are growing in number, there is a corre-sponding growth in risks, both to the user and to the internet as a whole by the hacking threats [54], whereas there is a lack of policy direction, user values on cybersecurity are misunderstood and there is a lack of clarity as to how IoT public policy should be de-veloped, as for instance being guided by stakeholder values [10]. Moreover, a new paradigm of proactive antifragility for cyber defence approaches is demanded in IoT, for instance in distributed computing paradigms of high complexity, beyond tradition-al cyber defence .e.g.…”
Section: Internet Of Things (Iot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IoT has therefore become prevalent over diverse sectors, with the Inter-net-of-Battlefield-Things (IoBT), or the Internet-of-Vehicles (IoV) [3,9] along with its security issues, contributing therefore to the increasing of cyber attacks. Therefore, lately, it has been a concern with cyber security in this domain, amid a lack of policy direction and lack of understanding of user values related to cyber security in terms of the IoT, while policy has not been guided by key stakeholder values [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%