2013
DOI: 10.1186/2051-1426-1-s1-p95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User vs. software-dependent variability of ELISPOT counts obtained from ten different laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most laboratories use an automated ELISpot plate reader to detect and quantify spot-forming cells. Since these analysers are large investments and manual counting of spots likely leads to higher variability of results when compared to objective software-dependent spot detection ( Ansari et al, 2013 ), we developed an ELISpot plate reader-free but software-dependent method to detect and quantify spots. Similar to the study of Hayashi et al that assessed response to cancer vaccine immunotherapy ( Hayashi et al, 2020 ), we used the Particle Analysis tool of the open platform software FIJI in which we set a particle intensity and size threshold to distinguish distinct spots from background noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most laboratories use an automated ELISpot plate reader to detect and quantify spot-forming cells. Since these analysers are large investments and manual counting of spots likely leads to higher variability of results when compared to objective software-dependent spot detection ( Ansari et al, 2013 ), we developed an ELISpot plate reader-free but software-dependent method to detect and quantify spots. Similar to the study of Hayashi et al that assessed response to cancer vaccine immunotherapy ( Hayashi et al, 2020 ), we used the Particle Analysis tool of the open platform software FIJI in which we set a particle intensity and size threshold to distinguish distinct spots from background noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%