Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Langua 2022
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UserIdentifier: Implicit User Representations for Simple and Effective Personalized Sentiment Analysis

Abstract: Global models are typically trained to be as generalizable as possible. Invariance to the specific user is considered desirable since models are shared across multitudes of users. However, these models are often unable to produce personalized responses for individual users, based on their data. Contrary to widely-used personalization techniques based on few-shot and meta-learning, we propose UserIdentifier, a novel scheme for training a single shared model for all users. Our approach produces personalized resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 For example, a title keyword search for 'personali' or 'personaliz' returns 124 articles from the ACL Anthology and a further 10 from the arXiv Computation and Language (cs.CL) subclass. These systems cover a wide range of tasks including dialogue [127,157,36,39,41,109,133,146,149,206,238,244], recipe or diet generation [147,87,159], summarisation [215,240], machine translation [156,153,194,237], QA [137,193], search and information retrieval [4,40,59,70,245], sentiment analysis [80,155,226], domain classification [129,114,113], entity resolution [132], and aggression or abuse detection [107,108]; and are applied to a number of societal domains such as education [118,163,241], medicine [3,15,225,235] and news consumption…”
Section: From Implicit To Explicit Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 For example, a title keyword search for 'personali' or 'personaliz' returns 124 articles from the ACL Anthology and a further 10 from the arXiv Computation and Language (cs.CL) subclass. These systems cover a wide range of tasks including dialogue [127,157,36,39,41,109,133,146,149,206,238,244], recipe or diet generation [147,87,159], summarisation [215,240], machine translation [156,153,194,237], QA [137,193], search and information retrieval [4,40,59,70,245], sentiment analysis [80,155,226], domain classification [129,114,113], entity resolution [132], and aggression or abuse detection [107,108]; and are applied to a number of societal domains such as education [118,163,241], medicine [3,15,225,235] and news consumption…”
Section: From Implicit To Explicit Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similarity between personalization and annotator modeling is that the most common approach appears to be using author IDs. These have been used, for instance, in sentiment analysis (Mireshghallah et al, 2021), sarcasm detection (Kolchinski and Potts, 2018), and query autocompletion (Jaech and Ostendorf, 2018). King and Cook (2020) evaluated methods of personalized language modeling, including priming, interpolation, and fine-tuning of n-gram and neural language models.…”
Section: Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%