1997
DOI: 10.3133/fs13697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

USGS Blind Sample Project: monitoring and evaluating laboratory analytical quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy of analyses was evaluated based on results of repeated measurements of USGS standard reference samples and certified high‐purity standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards, and by participation in blind‐audit performance tests conducted by the USGS [ Ludtke and Woodworth , 1997] and by Environment Canada [ Blum and Alkema , 2000]. Accuracy of analyses was better than 1 μmol L −1 or 1.5% for all constituents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of analyses was evaluated based on results of repeated measurements of USGS standard reference samples and certified high‐purity standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards, and by participation in blind‐audit performance tests conducted by the USGS [ Ludtke and Woodworth , 1997] and by Environment Canada [ Blum and Alkema , 2000]. Accuracy of analyses was better than 1 μmol L −1 or 1.5% for all constituents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time series plots of stream water concentrations were inspected visually for step functions, which can indicate changes in analytical bias due to methods changes. The USGS central laboratory has routinely incorporated blind-audit samples into each analytical run since the early 1980s, and the results are reported by the USGS Branch of Quality Assurance [Ludtke and Woodworth, 1997]. The bias of results for blind-audit samples analyzed by the central laboratory between 1985 and 1996 were tested for trends and inspected for step functions.…”
Section: Data Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates the importance of routine analyses of blind samples that have a matrix similar to that of the natural waters being monitored. Other quality-assurance measures, including submittal of field blanks, analysis of spiked samples, and documentation of changes in sampling or analytical procedures are also important [Ludtke and Woodworth, 1997].…”
Section: Implications For Long-term Monitoring Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulphate (SO 4 ), nitrate (NO 3 ) and chloride (Cl) were measured by ion chromotography on filtered samples. Accuracy of analyses generally was better than š5% on the basis of repeated analyses of standard reference waters obtained from the US Geological Survey (Ludtke and Woodworth, 1997). Detailed discussions of discharge measurements; stream-water chemistry sampling and analysis methods; and precision, accuracy and detection limits of analyses are provided in Sueker (1996).…”
Section: Flow Measurements Sample Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%