Using a behaviour change techniques taxonomy to identify active ingredients within trials of implementation interventions for diabetes care

Abstract

BackgroundMethodological guidelines for intervention reporting emphasise describing intervention content in detail. Despite this, systematic reviews of quality improvement (QI) implementation interventions continue to be limited by a lack of clarity and detail regarding the intervention content being evaluated. We aimed to apply the recently developed Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1) to trials of implementation interventions for managing diabetes to assess the capacity and utility of this taxonomy for characterising active ingredients.MethodsThree psychologists independently coded a random sample of 23 trials of healthcare system, provider- and/or patient-focused implementation interventions from a systematic review that included 142 such studies. Intervention content was coded using the BCTTv1, which describes 93 behaviour change techniques (BCTs) grouped within 16 categories. We supplemented the generic coding instructions within the BCTTv1 with decision rules and examples from this literature.ResultsLess than a quarter of possible BCTs within the BCTTv1 were identified. For implementation interventions targeting providers, the most commonly identified BCTs included the following: adding objects to the environment, prompts/cues, instruction on how to perform the behaviour, credible source, goal setting (outcome), feedback on outcome of behaviour, and social support (practical). For implementation interventions also targeting patients, the most commonly identified BCTs included the following: prompts/cues, instruction on how to perform the behaviour, information about health consequences, restructuring the social environment, adding objects to the environment, social support (practical), and goal setting (behaviour). The BCTTv1 mapped well onto implementation interventions directly targeting clinicians and patients and could also be used to examine the impact of system-level interventions on clinician and patient behaviour.ConclusionsThe BCTTv1 can be used to characterise the active ingredients in trials of implementation interventions and provides specificity of content beyond what is given by broader intervention labels. Identification of BCTs may provide a more helpful means of accumulating knowledge on the content used in trials of implementation interventions, which may help to better inform replication efforts. In addition, prospective use of a behaviour change techniques taxonomy for developing and reporting intervention content would further aid in building a cumulative science of effective implementation interventions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0248-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Development of an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care using a theory-based method

“…The BCT Taxonomy [30] has been used to retrospectively code interventions identified through systematic reviews [31], in addition to developing behaviour change interventions. Although this will ultimately help to develop an evidence base to inform decisions regarding BCT operationalisation and delivery, this work is still at an early stage.…”

Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses

“…When “training” was mentioned, it was coded as BCT 4.1. This approach is previously used by Presseau et al to acknowledge a minimum of educational strategies in the interventions [34]. A BCT was only coded when there was clear evidence of inclusion, e.g.…”

Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review

“…77 However, it is possible to incorporate a range of behaviour change techniques within implementation interventions commonly used in primary care, such as computerised prompts or audit and feedback. 78 Improvement strategies should also address both organisational and individual levels, for example, clarifying primary care team roles and responsibilities, and training clinicians to support patient behaviour change, respectively. …”