“…Diverse classrooms that are multilingual and multicultural, as identified by Ursula von der Leyen above, have students with different knowledges of what is, or different 'epistemologies' (Popper, 1967;Taysum, 2012b). These students' different epistemologies reflect different world views and can be informed by migration, tolerance and understanding of ethnocultural and linguistic diversity, international solidarity and global citizenship, inequality, disability, hate speech, polarisation and extremisms, radicalisation, experience of war, crises and trauma, age of lifelong learners, ethnicity/race, religion, gender, those recognised as being disabled by society, and GLBQT+ and marginalisation (Hysa & Taysum, 2022;MacLeod, 1995;Ruşitoru et al, 2020;Taysum & Arar, 2018). In terms of legitimacy for inclusion, diversity and equity of access, process and outcomes, there are signs of a potential shift from governance based on expertise, multilateralism and consensual policymaking towards majoritarianism, unilateralism, nationalism, populism and polarization.…”