2020
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a cervical ripening balloon to penetrate the placenta and quickly reduce bleeding by pressing against the placenta during pregnancy termination for patients with placenta previa in the second trimester

Abstract: Introduction: The clinical treatment is complicated for patients with placenta previa who must terminate pregnancy due to fetal malformation, death, or inevitable abortion in the second trimester. It is difficult to manage excessive bleeding during pregnancy termination; and those patients face risks of removing the uterus, infection and other complications. Patient concerns: Two patients had placenta previa in the second trimester. Both cases had to terminate pregnancy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The postpartum hemorrhage rate and hysterectomy rate of complete placenta previa were higher than partial placenta previa and marginal placenta previa, and the difference was notable ( p < 0.05), but no notable differences were noted in placenta adhesion, placenta accreta, neonatal death, and neonatal asphyxia between the three types ( p > 0.05). This was different from the research results of Su and Chen [ 18 ]. It may be due to the lower position of the complete placenta previa, and the cervix would be completely covered by the placenta tissue.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The postpartum hemorrhage rate and hysterectomy rate of complete placenta previa were higher than partial placenta previa and marginal placenta previa, and the difference was notable ( p < 0.05), but no notable differences were noted in placenta adhesion, placenta accreta, neonatal death, and neonatal asphyxia between the three types ( p > 0.05). This was different from the research results of Su and Chen [ 18 ]. It may be due to the lower position of the complete placenta previa, and the cervix would be completely covered by the placenta tissue.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, timely diagnosis of placenta previa combined with placenta accreta is of great importance during pregnancy. At present, the diagnosis of placenta previa combined with placenta accreta occurs mainly through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (7,8); however, patient physique, placenta position, external environment and other factors can seriously impact diagnostic results. These issues can interfere with timely and effective diagnosis of placenta previa with placenta accreta and increase the risk of adverse events during pregnancy (9,10).…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%