2019
DOI: 10.1080/24725579.2019.1567626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a game-theoretic approach to design optimal health insurance for chronic disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, comprehensive statistical analysis is provided to establish a belief that the results generated are not by chance or involve any biases. [21] presented a comprehensive game-theoretic model considering the association between cost-sharing and dynamic health outcomes for chronic heart disease by applying Stochastic Stackelberg Game (SSG). SSG needs to have all the information and knowledge of the player's strategies to make the decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, comprehensive statistical analysis is provided to establish a belief that the results generated are not by chance or involve any biases. [21] presented a comprehensive game-theoretic model considering the association between cost-sharing and dynamic health outcomes for chronic heart disease by applying Stochastic Stackelberg Game (SSG). SSG needs to have all the information and knowledge of the player's strategies to make the decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework proposed in [21] is an attempt to analyze cost-sharing health policies for individuals with chronic disease. This new framework is based on a game-theoretic scheme known as the Stochastic Stackelberg Game (SSG).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem on health insurance or healthcare has been studied in various papers from various perspectives. For example, Phelps [19] provided theoretical analysis and empirical estimates of demand for health insurance; Besley [20] explored the trade-off between risk sharing and incentives to consume increased medical care inherent in reimbursement insurance; Blomqvist [21] investigated the properties of optimal non-linear insurance schedules; Hall and Jones [22] analyzed the rise in health spending; Ellis et al [23] examined the efficiency-based arguments for second-best optimal health insurance with multiple treatment goods and multiple time periods; Gerfin [24] discussed the effects of cost sharing instruments of modern health insurance on healthcare demand; Ho et al [25] studied the optimal health insurance design for chronic diseases; and Zheng et al [26] examined moral hazard and adverse selection effects in healthcare utilization using hospital invoice data. All the aforementioned research works have paid great attention to the examination of "excess health insurance," optimal income taxation, explanation of health spending from the economic point of view, moral hazard and adverse selection, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pioneered by Arrow [1,2,3], many articles on optimal insurance problem under various constraints, with consideration of application in personal lines or commercial lines, have been contributed to the literature in this field. Typical papers include but are not limited to Smith [31], Mossin [25], Spence and Zeckhauser [32], Raviv [30], Doherty and Schlesinger [8], Gollier and Schlesinger [16], Young [37], Moore and Young [24], Lee [19], Zhou and Wu [42], Zhou et al [43], Bernard et al [4], Promislow and Young [28], Lu et al [22], Xu et al [35], Ho et al [18], Fan [11] and Zhang and Wu [40]. Most of the aforementioned papers assume that the individual would suffer a random loss and pay premium to the insurer for indemnity in case that the loss occurs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%