2009
DOI: 10.1614/wt-08-042.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Grower Survey to Assess the Benefits and Challenges of Glyphosate-Resistant Cropping Systems for Weed Management in U.S. Corn, Cotton, and Soybean

Abstract: Over 175 growers in each of six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina) were surveyed by telephone to assess their perceptions of the benefits of utilizing the glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop trait in corn, cotton, and soybean. The survey was also used to determine the weed management challenges growers were facing after using this trait for a minimum of 4 yr. This survey allowed the development of baseline information on how weed management and crop production practices have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although adoption of GR corn was much slower than that of soybean, approximately 35% of the US corn acres were planted with GR corn hybrids in 2006. Seventyl five percent of farmers reported planting continuous GR crops in a 2006 survey (Shaw et al, 2009). Due to the systemic characteristics of glyphosate, repeated use of glyphosate in GR crops could reduce infestations of perennial weeds such as common milkweed (Duke and Powles, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although adoption of GR corn was much slower than that of soybean, approximately 35% of the US corn acres were planted with GR corn hybrids in 2006. Seventyl five percent of farmers reported planting continuous GR crops in a 2006 survey (Shaw et al, 2009). Due to the systemic characteristics of glyphosate, repeated use of glyphosate in GR crops could reduce infestations of perennial weeds such as common milkweed (Duke and Powles, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey across six states in the US has highlighted that crop rotation is likely to be adopted as a mitigation practice to address problems with GR weeds by growers in the Midwest US, although the response was not the same across the Southeast US. [31] Encouraging results are reported also from Australian grower surveys; these highlighted growers' awareness of HR weeds and associated cost, thereby promoting the adoption of integrated solutions for the mitigation of the risk related to the evolution of HR weeds. [112] However, these studies also highlighted that growers prefer alternative herbicides to non-chemical means to obtain the highest economic return on investment.…”
Section: Foster Awareness-raising Programs and Coordinated Responsesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[26][27][28] This, in turn, may induce modifications of growers' weed management practices through intensification of herbicide use and use of herbicides with less benign environmental profiles, with consequent adverse environmental effects. [29][30][31][32] In regions where GR weeds exist, growers have exacerbated this phenomenon by increasing glyphosate rates and application frequency which further increases the selection pressure on weeds populations leading to more cases of evolved glyphosate resistance. [27,33,34] Diversification in crop systems and weed management tactics reduces the risk of weeds evolving herbicide resistance(s) and promotes biodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the weeds have already developed glyphosate resistance wherever herbicides are used without diversity Shaw et al, 2009;Sosnoskie and Culpepper, 2014). Many A. palmeri populations have rapidly evolved resistance to glyphosate in North America (Culpepper, 2006;Norsworthy et al, 2007;Sosnoskie and Culpepper, 2014;Webster and Sosnoskie, 2010) and it is an issue that many weeds from Amaranthacea family are predominant weeds in the cotton producing zones (Table 1).…”
Section: Recommendations Of the Analysis And Future Research Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%