2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92507-9_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Machine Learning Approach for Analysis of Polling Systems with Correlated Arrivals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same authors in [13] developed their research on polling systems to systems with correlated arrival flows such as MAP, BMAP, and the group Poisson arrivals. In Vishnevskiy et al [14], it was shown that the results obtained by a neural network are close enough to the results of analytical or simulation calculations for the M/M/1 and MAP/M/1-type polling systems with cyclic polling. Markovian versions of a single-server model with parallel queues have been investigated by a number of authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The same authors in [13] developed their research on polling systems to systems with correlated arrival flows such as MAP, BMAP, and the group Poisson arrivals. In Vishnevskiy et al [14], it was shown that the results obtained by a neural network are close enough to the results of analytical or simulation calculations for the M/M/1 and MAP/M/1-type polling systems with cyclic polling. Markovian versions of a single-server model with parallel queues have been investigated by a number of authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This method can be effectively used to study many problems in the theory of queues, for which finding a rigorous analytical solution and numerical results is either difficult or even impossible using traditional approaches. In particular, this method was applied to study a Fork-join type QS, and in [14] to estimate performance characteristics of complex adaptive polling systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%