2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a mixed methods approach to explore factors associated with evidence-based cancer pain management practice among nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One publication presented the results of a pilot study and included 30 nursing students attending a large metropolitan university [ 14 ]. Four of the articles were designed to evaluate and assess healthcare professionals' knowledge of pain management and included the following: 37 registered nurses working in the postanesthesia care unit at a department of anesthesiology and critical care medicine in a university hospital in Baltimore [ 15 ]; 40 registered nurses (22 nurses from an academic medical center and 18 nurses from a community-based regional medical center) and the electronic health records of 58 patients from an academic medical center [ 16 ]; 23 nurses employed in a trauma unit in an urban academic hospital in Western Pennsylvania [ 17 ]; and 51 nurses working at three medical and surgical units at a university hospital in Indiana [ 1 ]. The results are presented in relation to the two research questions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One publication presented the results of a pilot study and included 30 nursing students attending a large metropolitan university [ 14 ]. Four of the articles were designed to evaluate and assess healthcare professionals' knowledge of pain management and included the following: 37 registered nurses working in the postanesthesia care unit at a department of anesthesiology and critical care medicine in a university hospital in Baltimore [ 15 ]; 40 registered nurses (22 nurses from an academic medical center and 18 nurses from a community-based regional medical center) and the electronic health records of 58 patients from an academic medical center [ 16 ]; 23 nurses employed in a trauma unit in an urban academic hospital in Western Pennsylvania [ 17 ]; and 51 nurses working at three medical and surgical units at a university hospital in Indiana [ 1 ]. The results are presented in relation to the two research questions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differences within nursing practice can also affect the success of a patient's pain outcomes. For example, the study conducted by Eaton and colleagues [ 16 ] found that variations among nurses' practices influenced how they implemented evidence-based pain management (EBPM), i.e., years of nursing practice and level of nursing degree, as indicated by nurse documentation gathered from the electronic health record (EHR). They concluded that those involved in promoting an organization's EBP environment should be involved in establishing a standard quality of care, including national recognition as a “magnet designation,” as indicated by the American Nurses Credentialing Centre's Magnet Recognition Program; facilitation of best pain practices; measurement of success; fiscal commitment of human resources and technology; and the evaluation of evidence-based practice [ 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results revealed that nurses are often busy and are unable to perform optimal levels of pain management. Organizations must infuse evidence-based practice with training and education to improve pain management levels among nurses (Eaton et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 The study found that weak ability was a major reason preventing SNs from participating in scientific research activities. 25 However, medicine is an increasingly developing discipline, which requires the SNs to keep pace with the times. The SNs need to master cutting-edge information in the specialty field.…”
Section: Medical Cooperation Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%