2020
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a natural experiment to foresee the fate of boreal carbon stores

Abstract: How to cite this article: Bowman DMJS. Using a natural experiment to foresee the fate of boreal carbon stores. Glob

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Managing carbon by some combination of prescribed burning, plus the manipulation of forest biomass and physiognomy through thinning, timber and bio‐energy harvesting or from fire protection may conserve carbon stores (Figure 5) but a greater understanding of the trade‐offs involved in these interventions is required. This requires a much more coherent and comprehensive evidence base involving coordinated research involving lab and field measurements of emissions, natural and classical field experiments that study the effects of fire severity and forestry practices, that is integrated into forest demographic, carbon cycle and economic modelling (Bowman, 2020; Sapsis et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing carbon by some combination of prescribed burning, plus the manipulation of forest biomass and physiognomy through thinning, timber and bio‐energy harvesting or from fire protection may conserve carbon stores (Figure 5) but a greater understanding of the trade‐offs involved in these interventions is required. This requires a much more coherent and comprehensive evidence base involving coordinated research involving lab and field measurements of emissions, natural and classical field experiments that study the effects of fire severity and forestry practices, that is integrated into forest demographic, carbon cycle and economic modelling (Bowman, 2020; Sapsis et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%