Proceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2012.6465053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a scalable simulation model to evaluate the performance of production system segmentation in a combined MRP and kanban system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hierarchical production planning approach as described above is modelled with a simulation generator (Hübl et al 2011;Felberbauer, Altendorfer, and Hübl 2012;Felberbauer and Altendorfer 2014), whereby the calculation of the APP is a function call within the simulation model. During simulation there is a cross data exchange between the simulation model and the MILP-Solver as described in previous section.…”
Section: Production System Structures and Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hierarchical production planning approach as described above is modelled with a simulation generator (Hübl et al 2011;Felberbauer, Altendorfer, and Hübl 2012;Felberbauer and Altendorfer 2014), whereby the calculation of the APP is a function call within the simulation model. During simulation there is a cross data exchange between the simulation model and the MILP-Solver as described in previous section.…”
Section: Production System Structures and Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the complex relationships within hierarchical production planning structures, a set of conference papers (Felberbauer, Altendorfer, and Hübl 2012;Felberbauer et al 2013;Felberbauer and Altendorfer 2014) apply simulation to discuss different specific planning decisions. Felberbauer, Altendorfer, and Hübl (2012) investigate different machine allocation strategies when MRP and KANBAN controlled materials are produced on the same resources. Inspired by a simulation study for an automotive supplier, Felberbauer et al (2013) compare the effect of different employee skill profiles, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the sblock assembly scheduling in shipyard production and by considering spatial optimization, Zhuo et al [30] employ discrete event simulation to evaluate and improve system performance. Through a scalable production planning simulation model, Felberbauer et al [31] study the performance of two different machine allocation (i.e., segmentation) policies in a combined MRP and Kanban production system. Through a case study, Mahfouz et al [32] integrate simulation with optimization techniques to evaluate the implementation of lean principles in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with regards to three performance measures, namely cycle time, WIP, and workforce utilization.…”
Section: Background Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26]. The method is appropriate if the company has a sufficient overview on lead times and inventories and operates with stable and predictable demand [27]. This fits the characteristics of serial parts.…”
Section: Mrpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the case company already deploys MRPII, the investment is not of relevance. Another disadvantage is the missing flexibility and responsiveness when confronted with changes in demand [27]. This is the case for spare parts.…”
Section: Mrpmentioning
confidence: 99%