2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a smartwatch to identify the morphology of atrial flutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard ECG recording obtained with wrist devices is equivalent to ECG Lead I which is sub-optimal for the detection of P-waves and flutter waves. Atypical recording configurations could provide additional lead tracings more suitable for certain arrhythmias ( 6 , 54 ). However, from the user point of view taking Lead I ECG between the arms is easy and thus practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard ECG recording obtained with wrist devices is equivalent to ECG Lead I which is sub-optimal for the detection of P-waves and flutter waves. Atypical recording configurations could provide additional lead tracings more suitable for certain arrhythmias ( 6 , 54 ). However, from the user point of view taking Lead I ECG between the arms is easy and thus practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of consumer-grade wearable rhythm devices and implantable looper recorders is increasingly prevalent, and these single-channel ECG recording devices are subject to unique recording artifacts that can lead to misdiagnoses of arrhythmias. [1][2][3] In both cases, low QRS amplitude in the particular recording vector is mistaken for P waves when associated with frequent PVCs. Although the cause of the artifact is the same, the unique hardware and software configurations of each device require a tailored approach to resolving the problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these inherent limitations, obtaining recordings in additional lead configurations from the Apple Watch by placing the ventral electrode on the left leg or precordium instead of the left wrist (Figure 5) can be helpful in differentiating questionable rhythm findings. 2 The LINQ resides within parasternal subcutaneous tissue and samples at 256 Hz using 2 electrodes on the device body. Poor electrode contact presenting as asystole has previously been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we are not the first group who reported the utility and description of this technique, our study has confirmed its validity in a relatively large sample. Our previous understanding regarding the smartwatch ECGs were limited to the findings of several case reports and case series [ 7 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], and three studies on around 50–100 patients [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%