Using a stakeholder-engaged approach to develop and validate electronic clinical quality measures

Herndon, Jill Boylston; Aravamudhan, Krishna; Stephenson, Ronald L; Brandon, Ryan; Ruff, Jesley C.; Catalanotto, Frank A.; Le, Huong

doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw137

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We report on the findings from this multilevel stakeholder-engaged process to identify priority areas to strengthen HCBS within VA and the subsequent dissemination strategies to share results with partners to illustrate the impact of these collaborations on VA HCBS. 9…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A key component of this partnership was a series of focus groups and interviews with Veterans, caregivers, clinicians, staff, and administrators about their experiences with HCBS, to identify potential service gaps and strategies to close them. We report on the findings from this multilevel stakeholder‐engaged process to identify priority areas to strengthen HCBS within VA and the subsequent dissemination strategies to share results with partners to illustrate the impact of these collaborations on VA HCBS 9 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Engaging Veterans, caregivers, and system stakeholders to improve VA home and community‐based services

Leykum

Finley

Penney

et al. 2022

Health Services Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To understand Veterans', caregivers', and stakeholders' perceptions of home-based and caregiver support services and their suggestions for improvement to better align services with needs.Data Sources: We identified Veterans and caregivers at four EDCoE sites using the VA high-need, high-risk list, representing Veterans who qualify for home-based primary care. We randomly selected Veterans and their caregivers, stratifying by age.We also identified leaders and clinicians involved in clinical service delivery.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging Veterans, caregivers, and system stakeholders to improve VA home and community‐based services

Leykum

Finley

Penney

et al. 2022

Health Services Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dental quality measurement and improvement activities, which are integral to realizing the vision of a PCDH, have not yet achieved widespread use in dentistry. The dental quality alliance (DQA) has significantly advanced the dental quality movement through standardized measure development and validation, facilitating the use of measures in the context of broader quality improvement efforts, connecting quality measurement innovators, and highlighting promising practices [8][9][10][11]. Compared to medical care delivery, the pace of adoption of standardized dental quality measures has been very slow.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient centered dental home: Building a framework for dental quality measurement and improvement

Reynolds

Damiano

Herndon³

2021

J Public Health Dent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction This article presents results of the second phase of a project to develop a patient‐centered dental home (PCDH) model. Aims of PCDH model development include broadening the scope of prior dental home definitions to include populations across the lifespan, developing a quality measurement framework to facilitate quality assessment and improvement, and promoting opportunities for medical‐dental integration through alignment with existing PCMH models. This phase determined the components, or conceptual subdivisions, associated with a previously developed PCDH definition and characteristics. Methods We used a modified Delphi process to obtain structured feedback and gain consensus among the project national advisory committee (NAC). The process included a web‐based survey that asked NAC members to rank the importance of each potential component on a scale of 1–9. Criteria for consensus on component inclusion/exclusion combined a median rating and measure of disagreement. Respondents were also encouraged to provide open‐ended feedback regarding rationale for component ratings and additional suggested components. Results A total of 47 out of 51 members completed the survey. All 34 components met the quantitative criteria for inclusion in the PCDH model. Changes were made to components based on open‐ended feedback. Conclusions This project phase further developed a PCDH measurement framework that aims to guide practice transformation, quality measurement and improvement in dental care delivery, as well as integration between medicine and dentistry. Using a Delphi approach with a broad group of stakeholders ensured that components had face validity and were conceptually aligned with the PCDH definition and characteristics.

show abstract

Assessing the validity of existing dental sealant quality measures

Kumar¹,

Bangar²,

Neumann³

et al. 2018

The Journal of the American Dental Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Using a stakeholder-engaged approach to develop and validate electronic clinical quality measures

Cited by 4 publications

References 20 publications

Engaging Veterans, caregivers, and system stakeholders to improve VA home and community‐based services

Engaging Veterans, caregivers, and system stakeholders to improve VA home and community‐based services

Patient centered dental home: Building a framework for dental quality measurement and improvement

Assessing the validity of existing dental sealant quality measures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About