2012
DOI: 10.1080/13603111003721098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a transdisciplinary model to address inequities in field placements for teacher candidates with disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because there are nested and sometimes competing factors such as state accreditation requirements, professional licensure standards, university protocol, and research-based practices informing the policies and practices for preparing profession-ready special educators. As such, teacher candidates with disabilities often report feeling burdensome to their preparation programs and convey a general sense of unpreparedness for their disability-related needs among those who are intended to support them (e.g., DRPs, faculty; Bargerhuff et al, 2012; Griffiths, 2012). In fact, when special education teacher candidates with disabilities seek accommodations within their teacher preparation coursework, they often encounter hesitancy or uncertainty from DRPs, faculty, staff, and clinical field experience stakeholders (e.g., cooperating teachers) who are concerned such accommodations will compromise the profession’s standards (Baldwin, 2007; Griffiths, 2012; Leyser & Greenberger, 2008).…”
Section: Access and Equity In Special Education Teacher Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because there are nested and sometimes competing factors such as state accreditation requirements, professional licensure standards, university protocol, and research-based practices informing the policies and practices for preparing profession-ready special educators. As such, teacher candidates with disabilities often report feeling burdensome to their preparation programs and convey a general sense of unpreparedness for their disability-related needs among those who are intended to support them (e.g., DRPs, faculty; Bargerhuff et al, 2012; Griffiths, 2012). In fact, when special education teacher candidates with disabilities seek accommodations within their teacher preparation coursework, they often encounter hesitancy or uncertainty from DRPs, faculty, staff, and clinical field experience stakeholders (e.g., cooperating teachers) who are concerned such accommodations will compromise the profession’s standards (Baldwin, 2007; Griffiths, 2012; Leyser & Greenberger, 2008).…”
Section: Access and Equity In Special Education Teacher Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, teacher candidates attributed these difficulties to an overall awareness of negative attitudes towards educators with disabilities, both covert and overt. In addition, within the context of clinical field experiences, researchers found that some stakeholders perceive accommodating fieldwork as a direct fundamental alteration to the requirements of the teaching profession (Griffiths, 2012;Bargerhuff et al, 2012). When this occurs, disabled teacher candidates are left to report any issues back to their designated DRP.…”
Section: Accommodations and Special Education Teacher Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this occurs, disabled teacher candidates are left to report any issues back to their designated DRP. Otherwise, they will go unknown and unresolved, and teacher candidates often feel that they or their accommodations are burdensome to their respective teacher preparation programs (Bargerhuff et al, 2012;Griffiths, 2012).…”
Section: Accommodations and Special Education Teacher Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El bienestar de la infancia supone una cuestión prioritaria a nivel mundial (Prilleltensky, 2010), garantizando el derecho a una educación de todos los niños con igualdad de oportunidades (Bargerhuff, Cole y Teeters, 2012). Para ello, las políticas educativas apuestan por ofrecer una educación inclusiva que responda a la diversidad del alumnado (Leiva, Gairin y Guerra, 2019), basada en los principios de igualdad, equidad y justicia social (Álvarez-Arregui y Arreguit, 2019; Arnaiz, 2012;Ainscow, Booth y Dyson, 2006;Blanco, 2010;Calero, 2006;Costelo y Boyle, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified