2021
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Admission Karnofsky Performance Status as a Guide for Palliative Care Discharge Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients were allowed to mark their pain scores varying from 0–10 (0 indicated painless, 1–3 mild pain, 4–6 moderate pain, and 7–10 severe pain). Performance status was defined using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, 43 which was an eleven point scale suggesting the correlation with the percentage score ranging from 0 to 100 (indicating normal, no signs, or symptoms to death). The higher score signified less physical impairment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were allowed to mark their pain scores varying from 0–10 (0 indicated painless, 1–3 mild pain, 4–6 moderate pain, and 7–10 severe pain). Performance status was defined using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, 43 which was an eleven point scale suggesting the correlation with the percentage score ranging from 0 to 100 (indicating normal, no signs, or symptoms to death). The higher score signified less physical impairment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were diagnosed by nasopharyngeal biopsy, and the pathological types were undifferentiated nonkeratinizing carcinoma. Inclusion criteria were set as follows: (1) The age of the patients was more than 18 years old; (2) the Karnofsky score [ 10 ] of the physical condition before treatment was ≥ 70 points; (3) the blood routine, liver and kidney function, and other indicators were normal before treatment, and there was no contraindication of radiotherapy and chemotherapy; (4) the informed consent for radiotherapy/chemotherapy was signed before treatment; and (5) the radiotherapy/chemotherapy treatment was successfully completed. The exclusion criteria were defined as follows: (1) the patients had a history of head and neck radiotherapy and surgery; (2) the patients suffered from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes, and other basic diseases, and could not receive treatment; (3) the patients failed to successfully complete radiotherapy and chemotherapy; and (4) The collected data were incomplete.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karnofsky's score is mainly used to evaluate the general health status and quality of life before the treatment is applied in patients with malignancy. [9][10][11][12][13] It is used to predict the clinical status of patients before and after treatment, according to the side-effect profile of the treatment to be applied according to this scale. 7,10,11 Patients with CSDH are mainly in the older age group and their general health status and quality of life are lower than in younger cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%