2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach allows factors/variables/phenomena to be weighted in terms of importance, in this case smart cities and their related barriers as well as the categories of barriers. First introduced in 1980 by Thomas L Saaty, AHP is a decision-making tool, which assists in developing a hierarchical structure of variables (Saaty 1980;Luthra et al 2013;Luthra et al 2016b). AHP/Fuzzy AHP is arguably superior to other decision analysis methods such as fuzzy TOPSIS/TOPSIS, fuzzy ANP/ ANP, and ELECTRE and due to their limited acceptability and complexity (Harputlugil et al 2011;Mangla et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows factors/variables/phenomena to be weighted in terms of importance, in this case smart cities and their related barriers as well as the categories of barriers. First introduced in 1980 by Thomas L Saaty, AHP is a decision-making tool, which assists in developing a hierarchical structure of variables (Saaty 1980;Luthra et al 2013;Luthra et al 2016b). AHP/Fuzzy AHP is arguably superior to other decision analysis methods such as fuzzy TOPSIS/TOPSIS, fuzzy ANP/ ANP, and ELECTRE and due to their limited acceptability and complexity (Harputlugil et al 2011;Mangla et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of monitoring and enforcing strong regulations does not motivate or encourage SMEs to follow green practices. There are also studies investigating barriers to the adoption of initiatives in environmental supply chains (Awasthi & Kannan, ; Dou, Zhu, & Sarkis, ; Luthra, Mangla, Xu, & Diabat, ; Namagembe, Sridharan, & Ryan, ; Roehrich, Hoejmose, & Overland, ; Dey, Malesios, De, Chowdhury, & Abdelaziz, ). Luthra et al's () findings also showed a lack of rewards and promotions to be a setback to greener SMEs in environmental supply chains.…”
Section: Drivers and Barriers To Smes' Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy incentives were also found to correlate positively with adoption decision-making. The availability of funding programs (Zhai and Williams, 2012) and government support and policies (Luthra et al, 2016) were important in tackling barriers and driving adoption of technologies. The results of this study show that the grant incentive programme implemented in Lebanon to increase the uptake of SWHs did have a positive impact on adoption decision-making.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%