Using an artificial neural network to characterize the relative suitability of environments for forest types in a complex tropical vegetation mosaic

Abstract

Summary A predictive understanding of the environmental controls on forest distributions is essential for the conservation of biodiversity and management of landscapes in the tropics. This is particularly true now because of potentially rapid climate change. The floristic complexity of tropical forests and the lack or absence of data severely limits the applicability of modelling methods based on the ecology or distribution of individual species. Here we present an artificial neural network (ANN) model using the information available in the humid tropics of North Queensland: a structural classification of forest types, maps of the forest mosaic, and estimates of spatial environmental variables. The ANN model characterizes the relative suitabilities of environments for 15 forest classes defined by their physiognomy and canopy structure. Inputs include seven climate variables, nine soil parent‐material classes, and seven terrain variables. The data used to train the model consisted of a stratified random sample of 75000 points. Output of the model is used to measure the dissimilarity between the environment at each location and the environment that would be most suitable for the forest type that is mapped there. The model is highly successful at distinguishing the relative suitability of environments for the forest classes with 75% of the region's forest mosaic accurately predicted by the model at a one hectare resolution. In contrast, a comparable maximum likelihood classification has an accuracy of only 38%. In the remaining 25% of the region the environments are quite dissimilar to what would be expected for the forest types present there. This is especially the case at boundaries between forest classes and for a transitional forest class. Areas mapped as this disturbed, transitional class are generally classified by the model as having environments suitable to the forest type they are most likely to become. The approach has high potential for the analysis of climate change impacts as well as inferring vegetation patterns in the past and should be applicable wherever vegetation maps and spatial estimates of climate variables are available.

Site Classification for Eucalypt Stands Using Artificial Neural Network Based on Environmental and Management Features

“…Among the used variables, there was the elevation, aspect (azimuth from the true north), slope and distance from water bodies, and of known fire ignition points. Also, Hilbert and Van Den Muyzenberg (1999) included climatic and physiographic variables to classify 15 forest types in a tropical rainforest in Australia which resulted in an ANN overall accuracy of 75% and Kappa coefficient of 0.676. An interesting variable used by them was the soil water index (SWI), calculated from the digital terrain model (DTM), which is related to the soil wetness.…”

Modeling the Impacts of Climate Change on Phytogeographical Units. A Case Study of the Moesz Line

“…Several artificial intelligence methods can be used for modeling the distribution of plant species or phytogeographical units, such as decision tree, evolutionary algorithm, and artificial neural net (ANN). Hilbert and Ostendorf (2001) studied different forest types with ANN, and the research of Carpenter et al (1999), Özesmi and Özesmi (1999), Hilbert and Van Den Muyzenberg (1999), Özesmi et al(2006), Harrison et al (2010), andOgawa-Onishi et al (2010) should be mentioned, since they modeled the distribution of species or communities with ANN. Evolutionary algorithm (which matches the climatic parameters with alleles and provides a process similar to natural selection with finite length) could conclude which parameters (and which extrema of them) are able to express the climate tolerance most of all.…”

Methods and tools for assessing the vulnerability of forests and people to climate change: an introduction

“…with tools such as BIOCLIM 2 (e.g. in Beaumont et al 2005) or with an artificial neural network (Hilbert and van der Muyzenberg 1999). These models can be applied for studying the future distribution of ecosystems under climate change .…”