2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3399499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using AphasiaBank for Discourse Assessment

Abstract: AphasiaBank is a shared, multimedia database for the study of communication in aphasia. This article describes a variety of discourse measurement tools and teaching resources available at the AphasiaBank website. The discourse measurement tools include main concept analysis, core lexicon checklists, correct information unit computation techniques, and other automated analyses using the CLAN program. These tools can be used to measure a variety of aspects of language production for assessment as well as treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Processing and production of prosodic information in spoken language was assessed using the Aprosodia Battery (Ross and Monnot, 2011). Narrative abilities were assessed with the Discourse Production Test (DPT; Fromm et al, 2020), which requires participants to tell a story depicted in pictures, retell the story of Cinderella, and describe how to make a peanut-butter and jelly sandwich. Additional language measures were administered to PWAs only and included the WAB-R (Kertesz, 2006) to assess overall aphasia severity, the Boston Naming Test (BNT; Kaplan et al, 2001) to assess anomia severity, and a shortened version of the Discourse Comprehension Test (DCT; Brookshire and Nicholas, 1997).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing and production of prosodic information in spoken language was assessed using the Aprosodia Battery (Ross and Monnot, 2011). Narrative abilities were assessed with the Discourse Production Test (DPT; Fromm et al, 2020), which requires participants to tell a story depicted in pictures, retell the story of Cinderella, and describe how to make a peanut-butter and jelly sandwich. Additional language measures were administered to PWAs only and included the WAB-R (Kertesz, 2006) to assess overall aphasia severity, the Boston Naming Test (BNT; Kaplan et al, 2001) to assess anomia severity, and a shortened version of the Discourse Comprehension Test (DCT; Brookshire and Nicholas, 1997).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for this study were drawn from the Mandarin protocol of the AphasiaBank database located in the TalkBank System (Chen et al., 2018; Deng et al., 2021). AphasiaBank is a shared database that offers researchers a large corpus with a definitive goal to improve the treatment of aphasia by comparing discourse natures from patients with aphasia and individuals without aphasia (Fromm et al., 2020; MacWhinney & Fromm, 2016; MacWhinney et al., 2011; Sharma et al., 2019). The database emphasizes the collection of data based on a specified elicitation protocol that requires the investigator to follow a script for asking questions and eliciting narratives, which offers multimedia information including transcripts of discourse by specific tasks (Fromm et al., 2020; MacWhinney, 2019; MacWhinney & Fromm, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence will allow clinicians to judge the utility of these discourse measures for routine clinical practice. Combined with the resources provided by others in this issue, 49,51,68,76 clinicians should be well positioned to begin using non-transcription based discourse analysis in their clinical practice.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An update of AphasiaBank resources is available in this issue. 49 Among these is a dedicated web page for publications and discourse measures using AphasiaBank data (aphasia.talkbank.org/ discourse/). Through AphasiaBank, clinicians have access to standardized elicitation protocols, standardized measures with scoring information, and normative data that can aid in clinical utilization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%