2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using artificial neural networks to estimate the z-factor for natural hydrocarbon gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kamyab et al [31] also implemented the ANN modeling to predict compressibility factor for natural gases. The model introduced by them that covers wide ranges of reduced temperature and pressure (1 < T pr < 3.0 and 0 < P pr < 30) exhibits higher accuracy compared to the Normandin et al's model [30].…”
Section: Artificial Intelligent Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kamyab et al [31] also implemented the ANN modeling to predict compressibility factor for natural gases. The model introduced by them that covers wide ranges of reduced temperature and pressure (1 < T pr < 3.0 and 0 < P pr < 30) exhibits higher accuracy compared to the Normandin et al's model [30].…”
Section: Artificial Intelligent Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is postulated that a correlation of the equations for analysis of constant-pressure and constant-rate production (Equations 3 and 9, respectively) using the slopes of the auxiliary plots can be applied to the variable pressure/rate cases. In this study, the results of the analysis of numerous synthetic production data (generated by numerical models) revealed that the following correlation can be used effectively for variable pressure/rate cases during transient linear flow period: (10) where p m and q m are, respectively, the slopes of the auxiliary plots of pressure and rate functions. In the constant-pressure cases, p m is equal to zero and Equation 10 reduces to Equation 3.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further, it has been shown that these equations are not suitable for predicting hydrocarbon gas properties (Elsharkawy, 2004). Empirical correlations are another source of determining gas compressibility factor, which is easy and fast to use but is generally associated with erroneous predictions (Kamyab, Sampaio, Qanbari, & Eustes, 2010;Kumar, 2004;Sanjari & Lay, 2012b). A minor estimation error in the compressibility factor of correlations would lead to a false prediction of formation, density and the amount of gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%