2015
DOI: 10.3390/beverages1040225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Automated On-Site Monitoring to Calibrate Empirical Models of Trihalomethanes Concentrations in Drinking Water

Abstract: An automated, on-site trihalomethanes concentration data set from a conventional water treatment plant was used to optimize powdered activated carbon and pre-chlorination doses. The trihalomethanes concentration data set was used with commonly monitored water quality parameters to improve an empirical model of trihalomethanes formation. A calibrated model was used to predict trihalomethanes concentrations the following year. The agreement between the models and measurements was evaluated. The original model pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bland-Altman plot 36,37 for raw water (Fig. 5A) has difference scattered around the mean difference with no sign of a proportional difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Bland-Altman plot 36,37 for raw water (Fig. 5A) has difference scattered around the mean difference with no sign of a proportional difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The average difference (auto titratormanual) between the two methods was found to be −1.2 ± 4.6 mg L −1 CaCO 3 in raw and −0.6 ± 4.6 mg L −1 CaCO 3 in finished water. The Bland-Altman plot 36,37 for raw water (Fig. 5A) has difference scattered around the mean difference with no sign of a proportional difference.…”
Section: Results From Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%