2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11769-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using BI-RADS Descriptors and Ensemble Learning for Classifying Masses in Mammograms

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents an ensemble learning approach for classifying masses in mammograms as malignant or benign by using Breast Image Report and Data System (BI-RADS) descriptors. We first identify the most important BI-RADS descriptors based on the information gain measure. Then we quantize the fine-grained categories of those descriptors into coarse-grained categories. Finally we apply an ensemble of multiple Machine Learning classification algorithms to produce the final classification. Experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…III, we have obtained the best performance for the experiment A, with an AUC about 0.8 and an accuracy about 77%, while for the experiment B was obtained an AUC about 0.7 and an accuracy around 69%. As can be seen, our results (for both experiments) are better than those presented in [32] where a single classifier is used. Besides, if we compare with their results for an ensemble of specialist classifiers, our results are better for experiment A, and…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…III, we have obtained the best performance for the experiment A, with an AUC about 0.8 and an accuracy about 77%, while for the experiment B was obtained an AUC about 0.7 and an accuracy around 69%. As can be seen, our results (for both experiments) are better than those presented in [32] where a single classifier is used. Besides, if we compare with their results for an ensemble of specialist classifiers, our results are better for experiment A, and…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…As we stated in the introduction, considering [32,28,29], we can only reliably compare our results with those presented in [32]. Here, the authors selected the cases provided only by one scanner, the Lumysis, for the purpose of data consistency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation