2020
DOI: 10.1002/per.2305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Big Data and Machine Learning in Personality Measurement: Opportunities and Challenges

Abstract: This conceptual paper examines the promises and critical challenges posed by contemporary personality measurement using big data. More specifically, the paper provides (i) an introduction to the type of technologies that give rise to big data, (ii) an overview of how big data is used in personality research and how it might be used in the future, (iii) a framework for approaching big data in personality science, (iv) an exploration of ideas that connect psychometric reliability and validity, as well as princip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, even a simple variable such as “step count”—measured via different pedometers, wearables, and smartphones—varies between devices and deviates from the steps counted by human raters (Case et al., 2015). Knowledge about the reliability and validity of features is important to inform appropriate data collection and interpretation of the resulting model's content validity (Alexander et al., 2020). Much research is still to be done to ensure that ML personality measures appropriately measure the target constructs.…”
Section: Psychometric Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, even a simple variable such as “step count”—measured via different pedometers, wearables, and smartphones—varies between devices and deviates from the steps counted by human raters (Case et al., 2015). Knowledge about the reliability and validity of features is important to inform appropriate data collection and interpretation of the resulting model's content validity (Alexander et al., 2020). Much research is still to be done to ensure that ML personality measures appropriately measure the target constructs.…”
Section: Psychometric Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another pressing issue is whether PC produces fair results, that is, whether it performs equally well across different groups (Alexander et al., 2020), which may pertain to race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, confession, class, or culture. Any kind of algorithm‐based discrimination might result in amplifications of social inequalities due to systematic discrepancies in access to personalized services or targeted manipulation (Kusner & Loftus, 2020).…”
Section: Ethical Legal and Societal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thankfully, as of yet there is little of evidence of the prevalence of these practices. Nonetheless, as advanced computer technologies are rapidly entering mainstream research, psychologists must-and increasingly do-discuss the ethical challenges and personal responsibilities that arise from using these technologies (Alexander et al, 2020;Kosinski et al, 2015Kosinski et al, , 2016Matz et al, 2020), including powerful language algorithms like the GPT-2 and their applications like the PIG.…”
Section: Outlook and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current paper provides a brief review of the current research on social media text mining and its application to personality assessment. Specifically, we integrate major discussions in recent reviews that emphasize the need for psychometric and theoretical validity evidence of big data personality assessment methods (Alexander et al, 2020;Bleidorn & Hopwood, 2019;Tay et al, 2020) with technical issues that researchers and practitioners need to consider in conducting text mining research (e.g., social media text analysis methods, text preprocessing). Additionally, throughout the paper, we provide readers with references to various user-friendly softwares and guidelines that readers can consult in conducting their own text mining research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%