2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0205-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using biological networks to integrate, visualize and analyze genomics data

Abstract: Network biology is a rapidly developing area of biomedical research and reflects the current view that complex phenotypes, such as disease susceptibility, are not the result of single gene mutations that act in isolation but are rather due to the perturbation of a gene’s network context. Understanding the topology of these molecular interaction networks and identifying the molecules that play central roles in their structure and regulation is a key to understanding complex systems. The falling cost of next-gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent works attempt to apply quantitative models toward the study of complex microbial communities ( Bauer et al, 2017 ; Magnusdottir et al, 2017 ). The partiality of data (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics) from highly diverse ecosystems, together with the computational complexity associated with community-level genome scale metabolic modeling and biases stemming from automated and semi-automated model curation approaches makes topological-based qualitative approaches, as applied here, a powerful and relatively straightforward framework for the analysis of genome-wide ‘omics’ data ( Heinken and Thiele, 2015 ; Taxis et al, 2015 ; Charitou et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, it has been suggested that ecological dynamics, as predicted by network topology based frameworks, are of great impact on the metabolic capacity of complex bacterial communities and provide insights on the drivers of species-metabolite dynamics ( Noecker et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works attempt to apply quantitative models toward the study of complex microbial communities ( Bauer et al, 2017 ; Magnusdottir et al, 2017 ). The partiality of data (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics) from highly diverse ecosystems, together with the computational complexity associated with community-level genome scale metabolic modeling and biases stemming from automated and semi-automated model curation approaches makes topological-based qualitative approaches, as applied here, a powerful and relatively straightforward framework for the analysis of genome-wide ‘omics’ data ( Heinken and Thiele, 2015 ; Taxis et al, 2015 ; Charitou et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, it has been suggested that ecological dynamics, as predicted by network topology based frameworks, are of great impact on the metabolic capacity of complex bacterial communities and provide insights on the drivers of species-metabolite dynamics ( Noecker et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of study bias, which eventually leads to literature bias, is due to the fact that proteins with known biomedical functions and associated signaling pathways are studied recurrently [12,13]. And because knowledge assemblies massively depend on literature resource, they inherit pre-existing bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational and systems biology together with system genetics informatics are exploring efficient strategies; novel network analysis and visualization tools support data exploration and interpretation and, concurrently, enrich the large public databases. These new approaches are efficient in investigating traits important for humans as well as livestock, such as response to vaccination, obesity, fertility and feed efficiency [5, 6]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%