2008
DOI: 10.1038/npre.2008.1495.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Biotic Interaction Networks for Prediction in Biodiversity and Emerging Diseases

Abstract: Networks offer a powerful tool for understanding and visualizing inter-species interactions within an ecology. Previously considered examples, such as trophic networks, are just representations of experimentally observed direct interactions. However, species interactions are so rich and complex it is not feasible to directly observe more than a small fraction. In this paper, using data mining techniques, we show how potential interactions can be inferred from geographic data, rather than by direct observation.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea has seen tests (in the present time) that have yielded both positive and negative results, and yet a genuinely cross‐taxon, comprehensive test across many types of interactions (including interactions that are not known a priori ) remains a gap in knowledge. Using patterns of co‐occurrence to detect interactions is an emerging temptation, but ignores the many reasons for which species may co‐occur or not, and therefore remains limited and assumption ridden …”
Section: Frontiers For Applications Of Ecological Niche Models To CLImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea has seen tests (in the present time) that have yielded both positive and negative results, and yet a genuinely cross‐taxon, comprehensive test across many types of interactions (including interactions that are not known a priori ) remains a gap in knowledge. Using patterns of co‐occurrence to detect interactions is an emerging temptation, but ignores the many reasons for which species may co‐occur or not, and therefore remains limited and assumption ridden …”
Section: Frontiers For Applications Of Ecological Niche Models To CLImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of community turnover are usually performed with data represented in a table with rows corresponding to sites (or measurements) and columns to species. Some previous studies have considered how species distribution could be influenced by the joint effects of the abiotic and biotic environment (Stephens and Heau 2009, González-Salazar et al 2013, Cazelles et al 2015, Ovaskainen et al 2017), here we inverse the problem and describe how the distribution of biotic interactions is influenced by species distribution and the environment. Traditional approaches rely on measures of dissimilarity among communities, such as the Jaccard or Bray-Curtis indices.…”
Section: The Two Dimensions Of Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, though, the number of potential species that are involved in the transmission of a disease will be more than the known ones (Acha and Szyfres, 2003; Reithinger et al., 2007; De Lima et al., 2008). In other words, the number of known reservoirs is usually much less than the number of potential reservoirs (Stephens et al., 2009). This is especially true of a neglected disease such as leishmaniasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, what was not considered in that article is how this novel methodology can also be used to incorporate variable types other than point collection data. In this contribution, we show how the methodology proposed in the study of Stephens et al., 2009 to construct ecological networks can also be used to model other important variables. In particular, we use land cover to infer the role of landscape in determining the dynamics of disease transmission and dispersal and consequently identify geographical patterns and focal species for leishmaniasis transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation